On Wed, 2010-09-08 at 12:13 +0530, Ravi Kumar wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Could any one plz give me an example in which we need a separate snmp
> sub-agent.
> I have an snmp agent "snmpd" why do i need to write and extra sub-agent
> module.
> We can write plug-ins for agent itself to add more mib funct
You are right about the plug-ins. Following the example in the wiki, I
was able to compile the snmpd agent and have it respond to a custom
mib-node entry.
The idea of snmp sub-agents comes from the SNMP protocol itself, I
believe. You need those extra sub-agents on a system to respond to
requests/
On 3 September 2010 17:48, Robert Story wrote:
> On Fri, 03 Sep 2010 09:17:29 -0700 Wes wrote:
> WH> I'm actually wondering why we're not doing a full strcasecmp and why
> WH> we're using the 'n' version? Robert?
>
> good question.. I think that I initially only had the 'i' test there, and
> some
Magnus Fromreide wrote:
> The new test framework have generated some new test targets.
>
> This patch adds them to the toplevel makefile as well.
+1 (assumed we're doing rc3 which seems likely)
+Thomas
--
This SF.net D
