On 28 October 2010 21:02, Leonardo Chiquitto wrote:
>> CHANGES: snmpd: BUG: 3058101: Writeable 'long' instances work on 64-bit
>> systems,
>> but not writable 'int's
> This chunk broke the build on branch v5-3-patches:
Oops. Thanks
Now fixed.
Dave
--
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 6:10 AM, Niels Baggesen
wrote:
> What systems include OpenSSL 1.0?
PCLinuxOS2010 happily introduced it into their repository a while
back, breaking our cross compilation for an embedded platform. (Can't
remember what it broke or why host changes would have affected the
tar
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 6:34 PM, wrote:
> Revision: 19553
> http://net-snmp.svn.sourceforge.net/net-snmp/?rev=19553&view=rev
> Author: dts12
> Date: 2010-10-25 20:34:57 + (Mon, 25 Oct 2010)
>
> Log Message:
> ---
> CHANGES: snmpd: BUG: 3058101: Writeable 'long' instance
So, I have been hunting warnings these lasts days, and I can now compile
the trunk on RedHat 5.5 without seeing any warnings - and even a bit
more than the default agent. I hope that others now will try to keep
this the rule more than the exception!
My configuration is:
../net-snmp-svn/trunk/net
Hi,
I am working with net-snmp as master agent and a subagent which
register a private MIB with a table.
First I create a row with set the RowStatus = createAndGo, set the
row object (in my example a DisplayString).
Than I destroy this row again.
While de-register the row, while working
Den 28-10-2010 17:17, Bart Van Assche skrev:
> Does r19572 help ?
Yes, it removed these:
snmplib/transports/snmpTLSBaseDomain.c: In function 'sslctx_client_setup':
snmplib/transports/snmpTLSBaseDomain.c:492: warning: passing argument 1
of 'SSL_CTX_new' discards qualifiers from pointer target typ
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 6:27 PM, Wes Hardaker <
[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Regarding this change:
>
> > CHANGES: snmplib: Added functions snmp_register_callback2() and
> > netsnmp_register_callback2(). In contrast with the existing callback
> > registration functions, the two new f
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 7:10 AM, Niels Baggesen
wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 12:14:38PM +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > Neither the description of r19542 nor the changes itself make sense to
> me.
> > Sorry that I have already reverted these changes via r19546 without prior
> > notice - if I
Hi All,
I am getting the below error while i am trying to set the ifAdminStatus
for my system.
snmpset -v 2c -c private 172.16.x.xxx IF-MIB::ifAdminStatus.9 i 1
Error in packet.
Reason: resourceUnavailable (This is likely a out-of-memory failure
within the agent)
Failed object: IF-MIB::ifAdminSt
