(CFO = call for opinions)
While testing one of the features of the dtls trap configurations it has
become obvious that we made a poor choice in naming the config tokens for
configuring certificates. Also, there is a disconnect between the config
tokens and the command line transport config options
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 11:16:54 -0500 Bill wrote:
BF> I'm not sure what to suggest as a solution. For those who use
BF> net-snmp as the agent on a router, where asymmetric routing like this
BF> is very common, this black hole for the responses is a real problem.
IMHO, support for asymmetric routing
First, a picture:
10.1.1.0/24
-
| | eth0
manager router1 router2
| | eth1
-
10.2.2.0/24
The manager is singl
