Oh yes, there is one more thing.
At the moment the following, fairly basic, configuration fails for me:
/path/to/net-snmp/configure --with-defaults --enable-minimalist
as the build stops on the linking of snmpd with the error message
libtool: link: gcc -fno-strict-aliasing -g -O2 -Ulinux -Dlinu
Here is a simple demo I put together that exemplifies the problem I'm
seeing. If you run this code as-is, memory use will increase indefinately.
However, if you take out the snmp_send() call and just call snmp_free_pdu(),
memory use will remain perfectly flat. I should also mention that my
netsnmp.
Den 23-02-2011 19:07, Adam Mendlik skrev:
> My question is: is there a reason why snmp_send() is leaking memory, how
> do I fix it, or should I be using a different function in this scenario?
Are you checking the return value from snmp_send?
I seem to recall that sending traps is different, in th
Hello Adam,
If you can post a minimal example to this list that allows to reproduce the
leak I'll have a look at it.
Bart.
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 6:50 PM, Adam Mendlik wrote:
> I'm using 5.5.1.pre2.
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 4:26 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 7