On 03/11/2011 07:24 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote: > 2011/3/4 Wes Hardaker <harda...@users.sourceforge.net > <mailto:harda...@users.sourceforge.net>> > > >>>>> On Tue, 01 Mar 2011 07:54:10 +0200, Timo Teräs > <timo.te...@iki.fi <mailto:timo.te...@iki.fi>> said: > > TT> What's the usual time frame for getting patches reviewed and > committed? > TT> Could someone take a look at this? > > It's actually on my todo list to go review the patches. They're always > reviewed before the next release, and I (and others) try to do them > frequently but it depends on our "real work" life as to when we get to > them. The important thing is that because they're in the tracker we > can't forget about them, so you put it in the right place! > > [and I got better for a bit about reviewing more regularly, but you hit > me during a particularly busy time; I should have time next week to > review] > > > As you can see on the tracker I've had a look at this patch. I stopped > however because I'm not convinced that the introduction of the new flag > NETSNMP_CACHE_AUTO_SYNCHRONIZED is justified.
I added some more explanation now why it's there. I'll have time to fix things on the patch today/tomorrow. Hopefully we get it in merging state soon. Thanks for the reviewing and feedback so far! - Timo ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Colocation vs. Managed Hosting A question and answer guide to determining the best fit for your organization - today and in the future. http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
