RE: USM status not in time window.

2011-04-12 Thread Mygapula, Sudheer IN BLR SISL
Is there any way to resolve the synchronization issues through programmatically (is any NETSNMP wrappers available to do this task). -Original Message- From: Manjit [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2011 11:46 AM To: Mygapula, Sudheer IN BLR SISL Cc: ne

Re: USM status not in time window.

2011-04-12 Thread Manjit
It is issue related to time synchronization between agent and manager. Read RFC 3414( section 2.3 ) for more information. Regards, Manjit Mygapula, Sudheer IN BLR SISL wrote: > > Hello All, > > > > I am facing problem with SNMP v3 communication. > > > > > > > > What could be the problem;

USM status not in time window.

2011-04-12 Thread Mygapula, Sudheer IN BLR SISL
Hello All, I am facing problem with SNMP v3 communication. [cid:[email protected]] What could be the problem; I developed SNMP wrapper applications which will continuously running and servers the user request (kind of SNMP server). For some devices SNMP V3 communication always g

Re: snmget for v3 => Unknown Object Identifier

2011-04-12 Thread akshata s harkantra
Thanks for the suggestions. It worked after specifying the "-m ALL" options On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 2:18 AM, Dave Shield wrote: > On 7 April 2011 20:37, akshata s harkantra > wrote: > > I am using snmpget command using v3 for retrieving the variable. > > > > snmpget -v 3 -u testuser -l noAuthNo

Re: Wireshirk: net-snmp 5.4.3: table snmpwalk without using GETNEXT?

2011-04-12 Thread Dave Shield
On 12 April 2011 15:54, Dave Shield wrote: > On 12 April 2011 15:38, Zimmer Hu wrote: >> Could you tell me which way is the right way to make such a change? > > Not unless you send the header files I asked for. Oops! Sorry - I've just spotted the later message that included them. OK - I'll try

Re: Wireshirk: net-snmp 5.4.3: table snmpwalk without using GETNEXT?

2011-04-12 Thread Dave Shield
On 12 April 2011 15:38, Zimmer Hu wrote: > Could you tell me which way is the right way to make such a change? Not unless you send the header files I asked for. In order to help you solve this problem, I need to reproduce it first - which means I need a version of the agent that includes this mo

Re: Wireshirk: net-snmp 5.4.3: table snmpwalk without using GETNEXT?

2011-04-12 Thread Zimmer Hu
Dave, After I have "stCnt = 1" removed from free_loop_context_at_end(), the index of column grows endlessly. Hence, snmpwalk can't move to the next column. Could you tell me which way is the right way to make such a change? Thanks, -Z On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 10:28 AM, Zimmer Hu wrote: > Here th

Re: Wireshirk: net-snmp 5.4.3: table snmpwalk without using GETNEXT?

2011-04-12 Thread Zimmer Hu
Here they are. The last file is the freshly generated snmpwalk output log file with a shortened syslog sample. I'm trying the one with stCnt removed... On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Dave Shield wrote: > On 12 April 2011 14:57, Zimmer Hu wrote: > > Dave, attached is my code. > > And the hea

Re: Wireshirk: net-snmp 5.4.3: table snmpwalk without using GETNEXT?

2011-04-12 Thread Dave Shield
On 12 April 2011 14:57, Zimmer Hu wrote: > Dave, attached is my code. And the header files? > The rationale behind the code is to set index value at every beginning of > column loop. When loop goes back to the beginning of next column, the index > is reset to 1 and count again. The iterator fr

Re: Wireshirk: net-snmp 5.4.3: table snmpwalk without using GETNEXT?

2011-04-12 Thread Zimmer Hu
Dave, attached is my code. The rationale behind the code is to set index value at every beginning of column loop. When loop goes back to the beginning of next column, the index is reset to 1 and count again. The whole log file for snmpwalk is 718MB, too much to attach (open it in gedit takes > 5

Re: Wireshirk: net-snmp 5.4.3: table snmpwalk without using GETNEXT?

2011-04-12 Thread Dave Shield
On 12 April 2011 14:28, Zimmer Hu wrote: >> You still haven't provided the output from "snmpwalk" that I asked for. > > Here is snmpwalk output (only partial, too long as a whole). No - please post the *WHOLE* of the output. (Probably as an attachment would be best). Or at least make it available

Re: Wireshirk: net-snmp 5.4.3: table snmpwalk without using GETNEXT?

2011-04-12 Thread Zimmer Hu
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 4:10 AM, Dave Shield wrote: > On 11 April 2011 19:17, Zimmer Hu wrote: > > Here are exact output: > > > > 1a) snmpget > > > > # snmpget -v 2c -c public localhost .1.3.6.1.2.1.192.1.2 > > .1.3.6.1.2.1.192.1.2 = No Such Object available on this agent at this > OID > > Yes -

Re: Wireshirk: net-snmp 5.4.3: table snmpwalk without using GETNEXT?

2011-04-12 Thread Dave Shield
On 11 April 2011 19:17, Zimmer Hu wrote: > Here are exact output: > > 1a) snmpget > > # snmpget -v 2c -c public localhost .1.3.6.1.2.1.192.1.2 > .1.3.6.1.2.1.192.1.2 = No Such Object available on this agent at this OID Yes - that is correct. For "snmpget", you have to provide the OID of an instan

Re: Wireshirk: net-snmp 5.4.3: table snmpwalk without using GETNEXT?

2011-04-12 Thread Dave Shield
On 11 April 2011 18:07, Zimmer Hu wrote: > I'm going to try snmptable command, >better to have snmptable command in mbrowse... You'll have to talk to the mbrowse developers about that. It's nothing to do with the Net-SNMP project. (other than apparently being built on out toolkits) Dave