> On Thu, 19 May 2011 16:02:57 +0200, Joakim Tjernlund
> said:
JT> Please consider changing this in acconfig.h:
And here I thought we didn't have any of those left ;-)
Thanks! I've fixed it in the SVN tree.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to [email protected].
Hi Devs
Please consider changing this in acconfig.h:
#if HAVE_DMALLOC_H
#define DMALLOC_FUNC_CHECK
#endif
to a proper #ifdef:
#ifdef HAVE_DMALLOC_H
#define DMALLOC_FUNC_CHECK
#endif
It causes gcc warnings whne -Wundef is used.
Jocke
-
> On Wed, 18 May 2011 22:44:40 -0400, Zimmer Hu said:
ZH> Can somebody show me how to do GETBULK in netsnmp? Besides set GETBULK
ZH> handler mode, are there anything else needs to be done?
ZH> I've found bulk_to_next.c file, it seems can convert bulk request to
ZH> get-next, and get-next can
> On Thu, 19 May 2011 14:57:57 +, "Rusk, Mark" said:
RM> 1)When dlmod modules (x86_64) are built with net-snmp-5.5 (or earlier)
RM> are loaded into a net-snmp-5.6.1 snmpd the typedefs for oid are in
RM> conflict. You end up trying to register OIDS 1.0.3.0.6.0.1.0.4.0.*,
RM> instead of 1.
Den 19-05-2011 16:33, Wes Hardaker skrev:
> The reason I haven't gotten around to releasing 5.6.1.1 yet is that I
> want to fix not only the typedef, but the problem the typedef is
> causing. I can't find the bug. I've looked. I've run all sorts of
> applications on 64 bit systems and don't see
What I have found:
1)When dlmod modules (x86_64) are built with net-snmp-5.5 (or earlier) are
loaded into a net-snmp-5.6.1 snmpd the typedefs for oid are in conflict. You
end up trying to register OIDS 1.0.3.0.6.0.1.0.4.0.*, instead of 1.3.6.1.4.*
2) mib2c (at least the mib2c.container.conf in n
The reason I haven't gotten around to releasing 5.6.1.1 yet is that I
want to fix not only the typedef, but the problem the typedef is
causing. I can't find the bug. I've looked. I've run all sorts of
applications on 64 bit systems and don't see the problem.
So... Bart, or anyone else that ha
