Я отсутствую на работе с Вт 06/14/2011 по 2%.
I will respond to your message when I return.
Note: This is an automated response to your message "Net-snmp-coders
Digest, Vol 61, Issue 2" sent on 6/17/11 5:32:06 PM.
This is the only notification you will receive while this person is away.
-
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Jan Safranek wrote:
> vanilla net-snmp 5.7.rc1 does not compile on Fedora 15 and rawhide. I
> have quick & dirty specific patches in distro RPMs to make it work there.
>
> Now I finally got polished patches from Panu Matilainen, one of current
> RPM developers, wh
On Jun 17, 2011, at 11:53 AM, Jeff Johnson wrote:
>
> So YES is the answer for a transition to /var/cache/hrmib transition,
> with all the usual baggage and deprecation and AutoFu and compatibility and ..
>
> If so, w00t! And I'll try to find some time in the next week to send patches …
>
Apo
On Jun 17, 2011, at 10:57 AM, Wes Hardaker wrote:
>> On Fri, 17 Jun 2011 10:12:50 -0400, Jeff Johnson said:
>
> ...
> JJ> You run the script under cron.
>
Caveat: I am _NOT_ saying that you want to do this with cron. I am
saying patch rpm instead. The number of systems that MUSTHAVE a net
> On Fri, 17 Jun 2011 10:12:50 -0400, Jeff Johnson said:
...
JJ> You run the script under cron.
How do you (safely) install a cron script on every platform that has rpm
installed? How do you select the period at which rpm itself should be
run?
The non-cron way would be to execute the scrip
On Jun 17, 2011, at 9:42 AM, Wes Hardaker wrote:
>> On Fri, 17 Jun 2011 09:31:29 -0400, Jeff Johnson said:
>
> JJ> Again and again and again:
>
> Jeff,
>
> I looked at your patches the other day (and haven't had the time to
> respond; sorry about that... it was on my todo list for today)
> On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 15:51:02 +0800, "ZHAO Jing G"
> said:
ZJG> So could you please confirm that 32 will be the max length?
Yes, USM user names should not be longer than 32 characters. Or more
correctly, it's not the USM that limits it, it's really the VACM.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please ma
> On Thu, 16 Jun 2011 13:04:44 +0200, Leo Cacciari
> said:
LC> As I can not think that this was simply overlooked, I'm wondering
LC> why (special opaque) types as Integer64 or Double are nowhere
LC> defined. Could be that I'm simply missing the definition? Or should
LC> they be added to
> On Fri, 17 Jun 2011 09:31:29 -0400, Jeff Johnson said:
JJ> Again and again and again:
Jeff,
I looked at your patches the other day (and haven't had the time to
respond; sorry about that... it was on my todo list for today). The
problem is that both engineering approaches have problems.
On Jun 17, 2011, at 8:37 AM, Jan Safranek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> vanilla net-snmp 5.7.rc1 does not compile on Fedora 15 and rawhide. I
> have quick & dirty specific patches in distro RPMs to make it work there.
>
> Now I finally got polished patches from Panu Matilainen, one of current
> RPM develope
Hi,
vanilla net-snmp 5.7.rc1 does not compile on Fedora 15 and rawhide. I
have quick & dirty specific patches in distro RPMs to make it work there.
Now I finally got polished patches from Panu Matilainen, one of current
RPM developers, which adds support of all RPM versions between 4.1 and
4.9 to
11 matches
Mail list logo
