Re: dynamically changing the SnmpEngineID

2011-06-27 Thread Wes Hardaker
> On Mon, 27 Jun 2011 15:49:01 +0100, "Lewis Adam-VNQM87" > said: LA> I think our main concern was the possibility of memory leaks. Being an LA> embedded product, it's not simply a case of killing the process and LA> restarting it so while we want to offer the flexibility of updating LA>

RE: dynamically changing the SnmpEngineID

2011-06-27 Thread Lewis Adam-VNQM87
Thanks for the reply Wes. I think our main concern was the possibility of memory leaks. Being an embedded product, it's not simply a case of killing the process and restarting it so while we want to offer the flexibility of updating ip-based, mac-based, and text-string based SnmpEngineIDs, we also