Niels Baggesen wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 05:00:20PM -0700, Dennis Andrews wrote:
>> I downloaded net-snmp 5.7 (net-snmp-5.7.tar.gz) and built it with my
>> normal build environment
>
> What OS?
Based on the post, I'd say RHEL6.
+Thomas
---
Thanks, that helps!
A note about the general Mib index handling:
The default is to create the MIB index at the persistentDir.
But the default is owned by root and readonly, or sometime as on my
macbook, not readable for users.
So IMHO at leased the persistendDir should be configured at users
On Sun, 24 Jul 2011 23:45:29 +0200 Claus wrote:
CK> When I use a snmpcmd as non root I get always errors about MIB loading.
CK>
CK> How can I prevent this?
CK> What has been changed with V5.7 about mib index handling?
It's a bug.. Here's a temporary patch that can be applied to the source...
htt
On Thu, 21 Jul 2011 16:50:41 -0400 John wrote:
HJ> I have app 100 HPUX 11.23 servers running iexpress net snmp
HJ>
HJ> App 25 of them have errors with snmpwalk as follows
HJ>
HJ> ./snmpwalk -c sa1nt wpsscc00
HJ>
HJ> Timeout: No Response from wpsscc00
stop snmpd on the problem machine, and resta
On Thu, 21 Jul 2011 22:26:58 +0200 Claus wrote:
CK> while working on my UBUNTU linux system with net-snmp V5.7 I missed most
CK> of the IPv6 configuration at the MIBII if, ip, and route-tables.
CK> So I tested the the net-snmp V5.6 with the same configuration and it
CK> works fine!
Can you check
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 05:00:20PM -0700, Dennis Andrews wrote:
> I downloaded net-snmp 5.7 (net-snmp-5.7.tar.gz) and built it with my
> normal build environment
What OS?
/Niels
--
Niels Baggesen - @home - Århus - Denmark - [email protected]
The purpose of computing is insight, not nu
On Sun, 24 Jul 2011 04:18:26 +0400 Ilya wrote:
IY> Why do we use long to store 32bit integers? Shouldn't we change it to be
IY> int32_t? At very least we should make it 'transparent' to the MIB code:
IY> it should be possible to register watched ASN_INTEGER instance with 4
IY> bytes size and this s
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 10:37 PM, Rudd, Michael wrote:
> Currently we are building net-snmp version 5.4.2.1 / 12.fc11. We had
> numerous patches we had downloaded to apply as well as a few of our own. *
> ***
>
> ** **
>
> Now we are moving to centos 6 which has version 5.5 / 27.el6_0.1. We’ve
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 8:06 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> FWIW I'm assuming that sizeof(int32_t) == sizeof(int) on all
> architectures until proven otherwise:
>
There has been a time that sizeof(int) == 2 for most compilers. Net-SNMP
development started back then.
Bart.
-
I have app 100 HPUX 11.23 servers running iexpress net snmp
App 25 of them have errors with snmpwalk as follows
./snmpwalk -c sa1nt wpsscc00
Timeout: No Response from wpsscc00
All others are working fine
Can you tell me what to look for in diagnosing this problem?
Best Regards
Jo
I downloaded net-snmp 5.7 (net-snmp-5.7.tar.gz) and built it with my
normal build environment
which includes the host mib, and discovered that it was building with an
hrh_storage module.
So I started looking at the host mib. A walk of the mib produced (
actually didn't produce )
the FixedDisk in
Currently we are building net-snmp version 5.4.2.1 / 12.fc11. We had numerous
patches we had downloaded to apply as well as a few of our own.
Now we are moving to centos 6 which has version 5.5 / 27.el6_0.1. We've
noticed some of the 5.4.2.1 patches are applied to the source code and some
are
How can using an explicitly sized int32_t expose more archetectual
differences than using an archetecturely dependent long?
Brad
On Jul 23, 2011 11:43 PM, "Garrett Cooper" wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Ilya Yanok wrote:
>> Hi Robert,
>>
>> On 19.07.2011 00:20, Robert Story wrote:
>>>
13 matches
Mail list logo
