On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 12:07:40AM +0100, Claus Klein wrote:
> Hi,
> what is the status of the current V5.4-patches branch?
> Is it planed to release a v5.4.5 version this year?
I would expect that, yes
> I tried the following before working on some back-ports for this branch:
>
> + git checkout
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 09:25:19AM +0800, Shi, Darren wrote:
> So why we don't report initialized value zero instead of
> "No data available" ?
Because we then would have to increment it if a failure occurred, and
we don't know how to detect that.
/Niels
--
Niels Baggesen - @home - Århus - Denm
Den 21-01-2013 10:03, Shi, Darren skrev:
> I am developing a snmp agent by using NET-SNMP version 5.5 .
>
> I met a problem when testing HOST-RESOURCE-MIB, OID:
> 1.3.6.1.2.1.25.2.3.1.7(hrStorageAllocationFailures)
>
> It always shows "No data available" when query is made using iReasoning
> MIB Br
net-snmp 5.6.1
custom MIB
All,
Looking for some "perspective" regarding the implementation of the SNMPD/agent.
I have a need to monitor one of our systems. The unique aspect is these systems
may have multiple (of the same) devices/objects (up to 64). I have been
reviewing the implementation of
Hello Dave,
I am developing a snmp agent by using NET-SNMP version 5.5 .
I met a problem when testing HOST-RESOURCE-MIB, OID:
1.3.6.1.2.1.25.2.3.1.7(hrStorageAllocationFailures)
It always shows "No data available" when query is made using iReasoning MIB
Browser.
Can you do me a help?
Thanks,
