Dave,
On Thu, May 3, 2018, at 2:02 PM, Dave C wrote:
> Thanks, you solved my problem but with the path as /usr/local where I had
> installed openssl to.
Glad I could help. Since you said you were running Raspbian I assumed that you
used the OpenSSL Debian packages which usually installs in
On Thu, 3 May 2018 14:32:40 -0400 Bill wrote:
BF> > On Wed, 2 May 2018 11:08:44 -0400 Bill wrote:
BF> > BF> I just filed
BF> > BF> https://sourceforge.net/p/net-snmp/bugs/2864/ :
BF> > BF> "clientaddr" doesn't work to set the source address for
BF> > BF> traps any more. (And given that the code
On Thu, 3 May 2018 14:29:09 -0400 Bill wrote:
BF> On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 1:07 PM, Robert Story
BF> wrote:
BF> Depends on at what level you are looking at the functionality.
BF> -@ would set session.localaddr, which is a little different
BF> than setting clientaddr.
Can you
On Thu, 3 May 2018 21:48:50 +0100 Stuart wrote:
SH> On 2018-04-27, Robert Story wrote:
SH> > We're closing in on a final release. The current plan is to
SH> > have release candidate 1 next week.
SH>
SH> Is it planned to address
SH>
Thanks, you solved my problem but with the path as /usr/local where I had
installed openssl to.
I'll probably have to stick with 5.7.3 for production for now (on Pi
Compute Module) but seeing as you did me a favour I thought I would give
5.8 pre3 a spin for you. Perhaps I'm the first as I just
On 2018-04-27, Robert Story wrote:
> We're closing in on a final release. The current plan is to have
> release candidate 1 next week.
Is it planned to address https://sourceforge.net/p/net-snmp/bugs/2831/
before release or are distro packagers going to need to patch the
On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 12:53 PM, Robert Story wrote:
> On Wed, 2 May 2018 11:08:44 -0400 Bill wrote:
> BF> I just filed https://sourceforge.net/p/net-snmp/bugs/2864/ :
> BF> "clientaddr" doesn't work to set the source address for traps
> BF> any more. (And given that the
On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 1:07 PM, Robert Story wrote:
> On Wed, 2 May 2018 11:49:46 -0400 Bill wrote:
> BF> Is it too late to add this? This occurs to me just because it’s
> BF> an easier way to test the transports’ support of clientaddr, by
> BF> being able to set clientaddr
On Wed, 2 May 2018 11:49:46 -0400 Bill wrote:
BF> Is it too late to add this? This occurs to me just because it’s
BF> an easier way to test the transports’ support of clientaddr, by
BF> being able to set clientaddr dynamically via the command line,
BF> and I just noticed that this is broken in
On Wed, 2 May 2018 11:08:44 -0400 Bill wrote:
BF> I just filed https://sourceforge.net/p/net-snmp/bugs/2864/ :
BF> "clientaddr" doesn't work to set the source address for traps
BF> any more. (And given that the code path is the same, I suspect
BF> it doesn't work for client requests either).
Dave,
Try adding --with-openssl=/usr in the call to configure on your raspberry pi.
If you're brave you can also try 5.8pre3 from
https://sourceforge.net/projects/net-snmp/files/net-snmp/5.8-pre-releases/
--
Thanks,
Keith (pantherse)
On Wed, May 2, 2018, at 7:04 PM, Dave C wrote:
> I'm
11 matches
Mail list logo