Re: [REQUEST FOR VOTES] snmpd: Drop support for pass_persist on uClinux

2020-09-06 Thread Magnus Fromreide
On Sun, Sep 06, 2020 at 07:34:57PM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote: > On 2020-08-18 10:28, Magnus Fromreide wrote: > > I think the child code in the vfork case should be exactly > > > > execv(argv[0], argv); > > _exit(1); > > > > as that seems to be about what POSIX allows. > > > >

Re: [REQUEST FOR VOTES] snmpd: Drop support for pass_persist on uClinux

2020-09-06 Thread Bart Van Assche
On 2020-08-18 10:28, Magnus Fromreide wrote: > I think the child code in the vfork case should be exactly > > execv(argv[0], argv); > _exit(1); > > as that seems to be about what POSIX allows. > >(From POSIX.1) The vfork() function has the same effect as fork(2), >