est and further more i will work on integration.
>
> Regards
> Lakshmi
>
> On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Tim Cox wrote:
>
>
> Well Lakshmi
>
> Are you sure you want to develop both agent and manager?
>
> I assume you understand that manager is the client
Well Lakshmi
Are you sure you want to develop both agent and manager?
I assume you understand that manager is the client program usually on a
workstation / PC and agent is the stateless server in the managed machine
It's more frequent that someone wants to write parts of the agent and test it
Alizadeh
You could monitor the network with tcpdump or wireshark to see if UDP traffic
is arriving for port 162
BR
Tim
Am 17.11.2015 um 13:41 schrieb Alizadeh Mahmoud:
> Hi
>
> Is there a way I could test the "snmptrapd" if it is reciveing traps?
>
> BR
> Maali
>
> -
My agent (which is not NET_SNMP) may be obliged to force zero bits onto the
front of unsigned data
counter
TimeTicks
gauge
I don't think an agent should need to do this, but manager NET-SNMP version:
5.4.2.1 is display-editing illogically
Manager appears to understan
ed as a shared object which is dynamically loaded in to the
> snmpd agent using the dlmod snmpd conf directive.
>
> So, it can't read in arguments of its own.
>
> Tim
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Tim Cox [mailto:timmiles...@gmx.ch]
> Sent: 17 Feb
Tim
Why can't your application read a config file of its own?
Or look at its command line arguments?
Best Regards
Tim
Am 17.02.2015 um 13:20 schrieb Tim Culhane:
> Hi,
>
> Apologies for cross posting:
>
> I'm writing a c shared object which will connect to a proprietary server via
> telne
I haven't looked, Rohith, but since the MIB_TCP_CONN macro is clearly about
MIBs and not about TCP itself, it's worth hoping that this would make MIB-II 's
tables big enough to avoid the crash
Good luck
Tim
Am 18.02.2014 um 11:24 schrieb rohith:
> Hi,
>
> I have a customer who has more
t;;
>
> SOCK_STARTUP;
> ss = snmp_open(&session);
> snmp_synch_response(ss, pdu, &response);
> snmp_close(ss);
> SOCK_CLEANUP;
>
> /Gustav
>
> On Tue, 30 Apr 2013 15:44:56 +0200 (CEST)
> "Tim Cox" wrote:
> >If this is rea
le that the counters comes from the SNMP interface and it therefore looks strange to the user. I could inform them that the request goes over SNMP and is therefore included but I would rather access the counters in a way that does not affect them.
/Gustav
On Tue, 30 Apr 2013 13:10:11 +0200 (CES
It depends how your MIB is implemented
You may be able to see these counters from a simple socket application, maybe not
But how can it be so important? It should be reassuring that your enquiry traffic is also shown. Do you want to avoid incrementing the interface counters as well?
10 matches
Mail list logo
