Re[5]: lmsensors patch

2010-10-27 Thread maap maap
will be good enough you will accept it, but this implementation will have two different oid roots, first one - single table (as described in IETF ), second one - each table for each sensors type with separate indexes. Thu, 21 Oct 2010 00:51:18 +0400 the letter from maap maap : > > &

Re[2]: lmsensors patch

2010-10-20 Thread maap maap
with any sensors available in the system, should I ?. Tue, 19 Oct 2010 08:44:58 +0100 письмо от Dave Shield : > 2010/10/16 maap maap : > > I was so disapointed when discovered that default net-snmp lmsensors > > module uses single index for all sensor's entries, > > ev

lmsensors patch

2010-10-18 Thread maap maap
Hello Team, I was so disapointed when discovered that default net-snmp lmsensors module uses single index for all sensor's entries, even they are placed in different oid tables. Example: iso.3.6.1.4.1.2021.13.16.2.1.1.15 = INTEGER: 15 iso.3.6.1.4.1.2021.13.16.2.1.1.16 = INTEGER: 16 iso.3.6.1.4.