Hi,
> On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 14:02:52 +0530 (IST) madanagopal wrote:
> M>I came to know of a problem in Net-SNMP where if there is a SET request
> M> outstanding in the agent, it will not process any other request (even
> M> though the new request is a GET request for a d
Hi,
I came to know of a problem in Net-SNMP where if there is a SET request
outstanding in the agent, it will not process any other request (even
though the new request is a GET request for a different OID). Is the
problem correct? Is the problem still there? When is it likely to be solved?
hai,
>
> madanagopal> If a SET request is pending in the agent, what other
> madanagopal> requests will be put on hold until that SET request is
> madanagopal> processed? Is it that requests for oids handled by
> madanagopal> handlers different from the on
hai,
If a SET request is pending in the agent, what other requests will be
put on hold until that SET request is processed? Is it that requests for
oids handled by handlers different from the one for that SET request will
also put on hold? What about requests for other contexts?
We are com
On Sat, 11 Dec 2004, Wes Hardaker wrote:
> >>>>> On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 18:37:56 +0530 (IST), madanagopal <[EMAIL
> >>>>> PROTECTED]> said:
>
> If it is the case, can i do the following steps to send a v3 trap with
> different contexts:
>
> 1
hai,
> M> Currently we support GET and GETNEXT only. Anyway to support GET-BULK
> M> using the table handler what should we do? Should we add bulk-to-next
> M> handler?
>
> Yep. In fact, it's probably already being done for you.
>
Does this mean that in our handler is it enough to have a case
hai,
M> I know that i will get queries for only certain columns which will
be
> M> always walks.
>
> No, you don't know that. You may know that *your* management application will
> only send walks for columns, but you have no idea what some other user who has
> access to your agent will do. Thu
hai,
> M> > M> If [the response] has not come, i set "SNMP_ERR_NOSUCHNAME" to
> M> > M> requests->status and unmark the request as delegated. But i get
> another
> M> > M>
> M> > M> request for the next registered mib tree.
> M> > M> [...]
> M> > M> when i don't delegate the request but still s
hai,
> M> If [the response] has not come, i set "SNMP_ERR_NOSUCHNAME" to
> M> requests->status and unmark the request as delegated. But i get another
> M> request for the next registered mib tree.
> M> [...]
> M> when i don't delegate the request but still set "SNMP_ERR_NOSUCHNAME", the
> M> ag
hai,
I have extended the agent to support my own oids of a MIB. Since the
source for these data is external, i mark these requests as delegated and
communicate these requests to another process through sockets. Now when
the responses come from that process, i am unmarking the request
as dele
> >>>>> On Tue, 9 Nov 2004 14:22:34 +0530 (IST), madanagopal <[EMAIL
> >>>>> PROTECTED]> said:
>
> madanagopal> I want to send a v3 trap from agent. So i am using
> madanagopal> send_v2trap(). I have defined v3 parameters using
>
hai,
I want to send a v3 trap from agent. So i am using send_v2trap(). I
have defined v3 parameters using trapsess line in snmpd.conf. But i want
to send different context name for different traps. How to set the context
name for each trap from agent?
--
hai,
I tried to find out the way but was not able to do so. Any help would
be greatly appreciated. Sorry for resending. bye.
On Wed, 20 Oct 2004, madanagopal wrote:
> hai,
>I want to send a v3 trap using snmptrap utility and from agent.
> I added the following line in /var
hai,
I want to send a v3 trap using snmptrap utility and from agent.
I added the following line in /var/net-snmp/snmptrapd.conf:
createUser -e 0x1234567890 testuser MD5 testpasswd
and started snmptrapd and issued the following command:
snmptrap -e 0x1234567890 -v3 -u testuser -a MD5 -l authNo
> > I didn't add the createUser line. If i add it is now working only for
> > informs(snmpinform or snmptrap -Ci). But it is not working for traps(using
> > snmptrap command without -Ci). Why is it so? But i am able to send v2
> > traps.
>
> Have you read the SNMPv3 trap/inform tutorial page?
>
> I was fighting with this myself,
> did you add a createUser line to the snmptrapd.conf file in /var/net-snmp?
>
> This will send a coldstart-inform to snmptrapd on localhost with an uptime of 42
> timeticks:
> snmpinform -v 3 -u testuser -a MD5 -A password -x DES -X ppassword -l authPriv
> loca
hai,
I want to send a SNMP v3 trap(which i suppose is same as a v2 trap
along with v3 specific parameters) using snmptrap utility and receive it
using snmptrapd. I am able to send v2 traps and receive them. But i am not
able to send and receive v3 traps. I tried different combinations like
g
hai,
I am having a trap defined as follows in my MIB:
myTrap NOTIFICATION-TYPE
OBJECTS {
objectA,
objectB,
objectC,
objectD
}
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
18 matches
Mail list logo
