On 12/02/2013 12:53 AM, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-11-29 at 11:24 +0800, yzhu1 wrote:
>> On 11/26/2013 02:58 PM, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2013-11-26 at 11:05 +0800, yzhu1 wrote:
Hi, Magnus
Follow your advice, I made the 3 new patches. Now the patches are in the
Hi
Any update?
Zhu Yanjun
On 12/04/2013 04:48 PM, yzhu1 wrote:
> On 12/02/2013 12:53 AM, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
>> On Fri, 2013-11-29 at 11:24 +0800, yzhu1 wrote:
>>> On 11/26/2013 02:58 PM, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
On Tue, 2013-11-26 at 11:05 +0800, yzhu1 wrote:
> Hi, Magnus
>
>
Hi, maintainers
Any update about these patches?
Zhu Yanjun
On 12/04/2013 04:48 PM, yzhu1 wrote:
> On 12/02/2013 12:53 AM, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
>> On Fri, 2013-11-29 at 11:24 +0800, yzhu1 wrote:
>>> On 11/26/2013 02:58 PM, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
On Tue, 2013-11-26 at 11:05 +0800, yzhu1 w
Hi, maintainers
Any update about these patches?
Zhu Yanjun
On 12/04/2013 04:48 PM, yzhu1 wrote:
> On 12/02/2013 12:53 AM, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
>> On Fri, 2013-11-29 at 11:24 +0800, yzhu1 wrote:
>>> On 11/26/2013 02:58 PM, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
On Tue, 2013-11-26 at 11:05 +0800, yzhu1 w
On 12/02/2013 12:53 AM, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-11-29 at 11:24 +0800, yzhu1 wrote:
>> On 11/26/2013 02:58 PM, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2013-11-26 at 11:05 +0800, yzhu1 wrote:
Hi, Magnus
Follow your advice, I made the 3 new patches. Now the patches are in the
Thanks a lot.
Zhu Yanjun
On 11/28/2013 04:11 PM, zhuyj wrote:
Hi, Magnus
In some log, I replace nameData with the hex string of nameData.
Maybe the log file can look better.
The patch is in the attachment. Please check it.
Best Regards!
Zhu Yanjun
On 11/28/2013 02:55 PM, zhuyj wrote:
On 11/26/2
Hi, Magnus
In some log, I replace nameData with the hex string of nameData.
Maybe the log file can look better.
The patch is in the attachment. Please check it.
Best Regards!
Zhu Yanjun
On 11/28/2013 02:55 PM, zhuyj wrote:
On 11/26/2013 02:52 PM, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
On Mon, 2013-11-25 at
On 11/26/2013 02:52 PM, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
On Mon, 2013-11-25 at 19:04 +0800, zhuyj wrote:
On 11/25/2013 02:34 AM, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
On Fri, 2013-11-22 at 14:27 +0800, zhuyj wrote:
4.patch -p1 < V5-7-patches-snmpTargetParam_support_zero_OID.patch
snmpTargetAddrEntry.c:
Chunk #2
On 11/26/2013 02:52 PM, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-11-25 at 19:04 +0800, zhuyj wrote:
>> On 11/25/2013 02:34 AM, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2013-11-22 at 14:27 +0800, zhuyj wrote:
>>>> 4.patch -p1 < V5-7-patches-snmpTargetParam_support_zero_OI
On 11/25/2013 02:34 AM, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
On Fri, 2013-11-22 at 14:27 +0800, zhuyj wrote:
On 11/22/2013 10:54 AM, zhuyj wrote:
On 11/22/2013 02:45 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
On 10/16/13 10:31, zhuyj wrote:
If this patch is used in net-snmp-5.7.2, the following should be used,
too. If
On 11/23/2013 09:03 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 11/22/13 07:27, zhuyj wrote:
>> I prepared 3 patches based on V5-7-branch.
> In the Net-SNMP project backwards compatibility is considered very
> important. I think the patch "V5-7-patches-conf-su
On 11/22/2013 10:54 AM, zhuyj wrote:
On 11/22/2013 02:45 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
On 10/16/13 10:31, zhuyj wrote:
If this patch is used in net-snmp-5.7.2, the following should be used,
too. If not, snmp-trap could not work well.
Hello Zhu,
Please make yourself familiar with git and start
On 11/22/2013 02:45 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 10/16/13 10:31, zhuyj wrote:
>> If this patch is used in net-snmp-5.7.2, the following should be used,
>> too. If not, snmp-trap could not work well.
> Hello Zhu,
>
> Please make yourself familiar with git and start fr
On 11/21/2013 10:41 PM, zhuyj wrote:
On 11/18/2013 07:08 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
On 11/18/13 11:48, zhuyj wrote:
On 09/10/2013 01:41 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
On 09/10/13 04:04, zhuyj wrote:
Please help me to merge this patch into trunk. Thanks a lot.
Hello Zhu,
The code in
On 11/18/2013 07:08 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
On 11/18/13 11:48, zhuyj wrote:
On 09/10/2013 01:41 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
On 09/10/13 04:04, zhuyj wrote:
Please help me to merge this patch into trunk. Thanks a lot.
Hello Zhu,
The code in snmpd_parse_config_targetAddr() and
On 09/10/2013 01:41 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 09/10/13 04:04, zhuyj wrote:
>> Please help me to merge this patch into trunk. Thanks a lot.
>
> Hello Zhu,
>
> The code in snmpd_parse_config_targetAddr() and
> store_snmpTargetAddrEntry() assumes that targetAddTabl
On 10/26/2013 04:36 AM, Juan Bússoli wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to create a dynamic module for SNMP, which needs use some
functions that are in a dynamic library. To compile the module, I have
modified the Makefile that you provide me in the tutorial "Writing a
Dynamically Loadable Object", as
1. vi /etc/init.d/snmpd
Modify the OPTIONS to the following:
OPTIONS="-LS0-6d -DALL -Lf /tmp/snmpd.log -p /var/run/snmpd.pid"
2./etc/init.d/snmpd restart
3. tail -f /tmp/snmpd.log
you can see all the debug logs.
tests on net-snmp 5.6
Zhu Yanjun
--
On 08/19/2013 12:58 PM, zhuyj wrote:
Hi,
I run the following commands:
--snmpset -c NETMAN -v 2c 128.224.162.243
SNMP-TARGET-MIB::snmpTargetParamsRowStatus.0.25 i 5
SNMP-TARGET-MIB::snmpTargetParamsRowStatus.'..' = INTEGER:
createAndWait(5)
--snmpget -c NETMAN -v 2c 128.224.162
Hi, Magnus
Please help me to merge this patch into trunk. Thanks a lot.
Best Regards!
Zhu Yanjun
On 08/19/2013 12:58 PM, zhuyj wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I run the following commands:
>
> --snmpset -c NETMAN -v 2c 128.224.162.243
> SNMP-TARGET-MIB::snmpTargetParamsRowStatus.0.25 i 5
Hi,
Any update?
Best Regards!
zhuyj
On 08/20/2013 10:23 AM, zhuyj wrote:
> Hi, maintainers
>
> Would you like to comment on this patch? Thanks a lot.
>
> Best Regards!
> zhuyj
> On 08/19/2013 03:30 PM, zhuyj wrote:
>> Hi, maintainers
>>
>> This patch is s
Hi, maintainers
Would you like to comment on this patch? Thanks a lot.
Best Regards!
zhuyj
On 08/19/2013 03:30 PM, zhuyj wrote:
> Hi, maintainers
>
> This patch is similar with snmpTargetAddr patch. Would you like to
> merge this patch into trunk?
>
> Best Regards!
> zhuyj
Hi, maintainers
This patch is similar with snmpTargetAddr patch. Would you like to merge
this patch into trunk?
Best Regards!
zhuyj
On 08/19/2013 12:58 PM, zhuyj wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I run the following commands:
>
> --snmpset -c NETMAN -v 2c 128.224.162.243
&g
argetParamsRowStatus.0.25 -Ofn
.1.3.6.1.6.3.12.1.3.1.7.0.25 = INTEGER: notReady(3)
Now I attached the patch in the attachment. Please check it.
Would you like to merge this patch into trunk?
Best Regards!
Zhuyj
diff -urpN net-snmp-5.7.2/agent/mibgroup/notification/snmpNotifyTable.c net
On 07/31/2013 01:11 PM, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-07-31 at 11:23 +0800, zhuyj wrote:
>> Hi, maintainer
>>
>> Would you like to merge this patch into main line?
>> Or you have any concern, please let me know.
> Yes - I do have a concern. You have carefu
Hi, maintainer
Would you like to merge this patch into main line?
Or you have any concern, please let me know.
Best Regards.
Zhu Yanjun
On 07/25/2013 11:00 AM, zhuyj wrote:
> This patch can fix this problem. Would you like to accept this patch?
>
> Best Regards!
> Zhuyj
> On 07/2
What can I do for you about this problem?
Best Regards!
zhuyj
On 07/22/2013 04:13 PM, zhuyj wrote:
> On 07/20/2013 06:49 PM, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
>> On Fri, 2013-07-19 at 16:09 +0800, zhuyj wrote:
>>> Would you like to give me some advice to make this patch better?
>&
This patch can fix this problem. Would you like to accept this patch?
Best Regards!
Zhuyj
On 07/25/2013 10:55 AM, zhuyj wrote:
1. create a new file called /etc/snmp/snmptrapd.conf
---Content
1. create a new file called /etc/snmp/snmptrapd.conf
---Content--
###
#
# snmptrapd.conf
#
# - created by the snmpconf configuration program
#
#
On 07/20/2013 06:49 PM, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-07-19 at 16:09 +0800, zhuyj wrote:
>> Would you like to give me some advice to make this patch better?
> I could do a partial commit of a corrected patch that covers the indices
> in snmpTargetAddrTable right now,
On 07/20/2013 06:49 PM, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-07-19 at 16:09 +0800, zhuyj wrote:
>> Would you like to give me some advice to make this patch better?
> I could do a partial commit of a corrected patch that covers the indices
> in snmpTargetAddrTable right now,
Would you like to give me some advice to make this patch better?
On 07/16/2013 04:49 PM, zhuyj wrote:
> Hi, Magnus
>
> Based on your patch, I made a new patch. This patch depends on
> net-snmp5.7.2.
> I made the following modifications compared with your patch:
> 1.add strdup2
2.1.2.1.9.1.25 = INTEGER: notReady(3)
.1.3.6.1.6.3.12.1.2.1.9.1.25.1 = INTEGER: notReady(3)
.1.3.6.1.6.3.12.1.2.1.9.1.25.1.1 = INTEGER: notReady(3)
.1.3.6.1.6.3.12.1.2.1.9.1.25.1.1.1 = INTEGER: notReady(3)
.1.3.6.1.6.3.12.1.2.1.9.1.26 = INTEGER: notReady(3)
.1.3.6.1.6.3.12.1.2.1.9.1.27 = INTEGER: notReady(3
Any advice?
On 07/16/2013 04:49 PM, zhuyj wrote:
> Hi, Magnus
>
> Based on your patch, I made a new patch. This patch depends on
> net-snmp5.7.2.
> I made the following modifications compared with your patch:
> 1.add strdup2 to replace strdup;
> 2.modify addToList function
Hi,
Please give some advice about this patch.
Thanks.
Best Regards!
zhuyj
On 07/16/2013 04:49 PM, zhuyj wrote:
> Hi, Magnus
>
> Based on your patch, I made a new patch. This patch depends on
> net-snmp5.7.2.
> I made the following modifications compared with your patch:
>
is in the attachment. Please check it.
Best Regards!
zhuyj
On 07/16/2013 02:14 PM, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
On Tue, 2013-07-16 at 10:27 +0800, zhuyj wrote:
Thanks for your help!
I agree with you. It is a big task to replace all the NUL-terminated
string with counted-string.
Now I have a patch that
Thanks for your help!
I agree with you. It is a big task to replace all the NUL-terminated
string with counted-string.
Now I have a patch that can fix this. Would you like to merge this patch
in master of net-snmp?
zhuyj
On 07/15/2013 09:29 PM, Bill Fenner wrote:
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 6:39
Hi,
If I fix all the problems, do you want to merge this patch into master?
zhuyj
On 07/11/2013 05:29 PM, zhuyj wrote:
> Hi,
> something is wrong with these modifications. The root cause is that
> strdup handles string as normal string. We should rewrite strdup
> function.
&
Hi, Magnus && Niels
Thanks for your help! I am testing your patch. This patch can solve the
most problems.
But Ihave a question, is this a bug? I mean that '0' in snmpAdminString
is a bug, or not?
Would you like to discuss this with me?
zhuyj
On 07/10/2013 04:53 PM, Magn
buf);
+ptr->params = strdup(buf);
ptr->storageType = ST_READONLY;
ptr->rowStatus = RS_ACTIVE;
ptr->sess = ss;
zhuyj
On 07/11/2013 01:50 PM, zhuyj wrote:
> Hi,
>
> in snprintf, we do not consider that 0 is in nameData. strdup(cptr)
> doe
f(line)-1 ] = 0;
for (i = 0; i < curr_struct->tDomainLen; i++) {
snprintf(&line[strlen(line)],
zhuyj
On 07/10/2013 07:17 PM, zhuyj wrote:
> Hi
>
> name is .0.25.1, we can not snmpwalk it. But .3.25.1, we can snmpwalk it.
>
> Maybe it is related with 0.
Hi
name is .0.25.1, we can not snmpwalk it. But .3.25.1, we can snmpwalk it.
Maybe it is related with 0. I will look into it.
zhuyj
user@ubuntu1004:~/net-snmp-5.7.2$ snmpset -v 2c -c NETMAN 127.0.0.1
.1.3.6.1.6.3.12.1.2.1.9.3.25.1 i 5
SNMP-TARGET-MIB::snmpTargetAddrRowStatus.'...'
Hi,
But snmpget can work well.
user@ubuntu1004:~/net-snmp-5.7.2$ snmpget -v 2c -c NETMAN 127.0.0.1
.1.3.6.1.6.3.12.1.2.1.9.0.25.1 -Ofn
.1.3.6.1.6.3.12.1.2.1.9.0.25.1 = INTEGER: notReady(3)
zhuyj
On 07/10/2013 06:54 PM, zhuyj wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After I applied this patch, the followi
Hi,
After I applied this patch, the following is the test result.
When we made the name bigger than 2, we can not snmpwalk it.
I will look into it.
Zhuyj
user@ubuntu1004:~/net-snmp-5.7.2$ snmpwalk -v 2c -c NETMAN 127.0.0.1
.1.3.6.1.6.3.12.1.2.1.9 -Ofn
.1.3.6.1.6.3.12.1.2.1.9.0.25 = INTEGER
On 07/10/2013 04:53 PM, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-07-10 at 10:34 +0800, zhuyj wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Attempting to create a new entry with a zero index fails silently.
> Ok, You want to index your entry with the string .
>
> The mess up is, just as usual, t
On 07/10/2013 04:53 PM, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-07-10 at 10:34 +0800, zhuyj wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Attempting to create a new entry with a zero index fails silently.
> Ok, You want to index your entry with the string .
>
> The mess up is, just as usual, t
OK. Thanks a lot.
I will make tests about this.
Zhuyj
On 07/10/2013 04:53 PM, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-07-10 at 10:34 +0800, zhuyj wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Attempting to create a new entry with a zero index fails silently.
> Ok, You want to index your entry with t
On 07/10/2013 03:22 PM, zhuyj wrote:
On 07/10/2013 02:04 PM, zhuyj wrote:
On 07/10/2013 01:41 PM, Niels Baggesen wrote:
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 10:34:05AM +0800, zhuyj wrote:
root@localhost:/root> snmpset -v 2c -c public 192.168.2.15
.1.3.6.1.6.3.12.1.2.1.9.0.25 i 5
SNMP-TARGET-
On 07/10/2013 02:04 PM, zhuyj wrote:
On 07/10/2013 01:41 PM, Niels Baggesen wrote:
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 10:34:05AM +0800, zhuyj wrote:
root@localhost:/root> snmpset -v 2c -c public 192.168.2.15
.1.3.6.1.6.3.12.1.2.1.9.0.25 i 5
SNMP-TARGET-MIB::snmpTargetAddrRowStatus.'..&#x
On 07/10/2013 01:41 PM, Niels Baggesen wrote:
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 10:34:05AM +0800, zhuyj wrote:
root@localhost:/root> snmpset -v 2c -c public 192.168.2.15
.1.3.6.1.6.3.12.1.2.1.9.0.25 i 5
SNMP-TARGET-MIB::snmpTargetAddrRowStatus.'..' = INTEGER: createAndWait(5)
root@lo
On 07/10/2013 01:35 PM, zhuyj wrote:
> On 07/10/2013 10:44 AM, zhuyj wrote:
>> On 07/10/2013 10:34 AM, zhuyj wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Attempting to create a new entry with a zero index fails silently.
>>>
>>> root
On 07/10/2013 10:44 AM, zhuyj wrote:
> On 07/10/2013 10:34 AM, zhuyj wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Attempting to create a new entry with a zero index fails silently.
>>
>> root@localhost:/root> snmpset -v 2c -c public 192.168.2.15
>> .1.3.6.1.
On 07/10/2013 10:34 AM, zhuyj wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Attempting to create a new entry with a zero index fails silently.
>
> root@localhost:/root> snmpset -v 2c -c public 192.168.2.15
> .1.3.6.1.6.3.12.1.2.1.9.0.25 i 5
> SNMP-TARGET-MIB::snmpTargetAddrRowStatus.'..'
ion to?
Best regards.
zhuyj
--
See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics
Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics
Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds.
Sta
54 matches
Mail list logo
