On 12/02/2013 12:53 AM, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
On Fri, 2013-11-29 at 11:24 +0800, yzhu1 wrote:
On 11/26/2013 02:58 PM, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
On Tue, 2013-11-26 at 11:05 +0800, yzhu1 wrote:
Hi, Magnus
Follow your advice, I made the 3 new patches. Now the patches are in the
attachment.
Hi
Any update?
Zhu Yanjun
On 12/04/2013 04:48 PM, yzhu1 wrote:
On 12/02/2013 12:53 AM, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
On Fri, 2013-11-29 at 11:24 +0800, yzhu1 wrote:
On 11/26/2013 02:58 PM, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
On Tue, 2013-11-26 at 11:05 +0800, yzhu1 wrote:
Hi, Magnus
Follow your advice, I
Hi, maintainers
Any update about these patches?
Zhu Yanjun
On 12/04/2013 04:48 PM, yzhu1 wrote:
On 12/02/2013 12:53 AM, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
On Fri, 2013-11-29 at 11:24 +0800, yzhu1 wrote:
On 11/26/2013 02:58 PM, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
On Tue, 2013-11-26 at 11:05 +0800, yzhu1 wrote:
Hi, maintainers
Any update about these patches?
Zhu Yanjun
On 12/04/2013 04:48 PM, yzhu1 wrote:
On 12/02/2013 12:53 AM, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
On Fri, 2013-11-29 at 11:24 +0800, yzhu1 wrote:
On 11/26/2013 02:58 PM, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
On Tue, 2013-11-26 at 11:05 +0800, yzhu1 wrote:
On 12/02/2013 12:53 AM, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
On Fri, 2013-11-29 at 11:24 +0800, yzhu1 wrote:
On 11/26/2013 02:58 PM, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
On Tue, 2013-11-26 at 11:05 +0800, yzhu1 wrote:
Hi, Magnus
Follow your advice, I made the 3 new patches. Now the patches are in the
attachment.
Hi, Magnus
In some log, I replace nameData with the hex string of nameData.
Maybe the log file can look better.
The patch is in the attachment. Please check it.
Best Regards!
Zhu Yanjun
On 11/28/2013 02:55 PM, zhuyj wrote:
On 11/26/2013 02:52 PM, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
On Mon, 2013-11-25
a lot.
Zhu Yanjun
On 11/28/2013 04:11 PM, zhuyj wrote:
Hi, Magnus
In some log, I replace nameData with the hex string of nameData.
Maybe the log file can look better.
The patch is in the attachment. Please check it.
Best Regards!
Zhu Yanjun
On 11/28/2013 02:55 PM, zhuyj wrote:
On 11/26/2013 02
On 11/26/2013 02:52 PM, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
On Mon, 2013-11-25 at 19:04 +0800, zhuyj wrote:
On 11/25/2013 02:34 AM, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
On Fri, 2013-11-22 at 14:27 +0800, zhuyj wrote:
4.patch -p1 V5-7-patches-snmpTargetParam_support_zero_OID.patch
snmpTargetAddrEntry.c:
Chunk #2
On 11/26/2013 02:52 PM, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
On Mon, 2013-11-25 at 19:04 +0800, zhuyj wrote:
On 11/25/2013 02:34 AM, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
On Fri, 2013-11-22 at 14:27 +0800, zhuyj wrote:
4.patch -p1 V5-7-patches-snmpTargetParam_support_zero_OID.patch
snmpTargetAddrEntry.c:
Chunk #2
On 11/23/2013 09:03 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
On 11/22/13 07:27, zhuyj wrote:
I prepared 3 patches based on V5-7-branch.
In the Net-SNMP project backwards compatibility is considered very
important. I think the patch V5-7-patches-conf-support.patch changes
snmpd_parse_config_targetAddr
On 11/25/2013 02:34 AM, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
On Fri, 2013-11-22 at 14:27 +0800, zhuyj wrote:
On 11/22/2013 10:54 AM, zhuyj wrote:
On 11/22/2013 02:45 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
On 10/16/13 10:31, zhuyj wrote:
If this patch is used in net-snmp-5.7.2, the following should be used,
too
On 11/18/2013 07:08 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
On 11/18/13 11:48, zhuyj wrote:
On 09/10/2013 01:41 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
On 09/10/13 04:04, zhuyj wrote:
Please help me to merge this patch into trunk. Thanks a lot.
Hello Zhu,
The code in snmpd_parse_config_targetAddr
On 11/21/2013 10:41 PM, zhuyj wrote:
On 11/18/2013 07:08 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
On 11/18/13 11:48, zhuyj wrote:
On 09/10/2013 01:41 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
On 09/10/13 04:04, zhuyj wrote:
Please help me to merge this patch into trunk. Thanks a lot.
Hello Zhu,
The code
On 11/22/2013 02:45 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
On 10/16/13 10:31, zhuyj wrote:
If this patch is used in net-snmp-5.7.2, the following should be used,
too. If not, snmp-trap could not work well.
Hello Zhu,
Please make yourself familiar with git and start from the V5-7-patches
or master
On 11/22/2013 10:54 AM, zhuyj wrote:
On 11/22/2013 02:45 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
On 10/16/13 10:31, zhuyj wrote:
If this patch is used in net-snmp-5.7.2, the following should be used,
too. If not, snmp-trap could not work well.
Hello Zhu,
Please make yourself familiar with git and start
On 09/10/2013 01:41 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
On 09/10/13 04:04, zhuyj wrote:
Please help me to merge this patch into trunk. Thanks a lot.
Hello Zhu,
The code in snmpd_parse_config_targetAddr() and
store_snmpTargetAddrEntry() assumes that targetAddTable_struct.params
is an ASCII string
On 10/26/2013 04:36 AM, Juan Bússoli wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to create a dynamic module for SNMP, which needs use some
functions that are in a dynamic library. To compile the module, I have
modified the Makefile that you provide me in the tutorial Writing a
Dynamically Loadable Object, as
1. vi /etc/init.d/snmpd
Modify the OPTIONS to the following:
OPTIONS=-LS0-6d -DALL -Lf /tmp/snmpd.log -p /var/run/snmpd.pid
2./etc/init.d/snmpd restart
3. tail -f /tmp/snmpd.log
you can see all the debug logs.
tests on net-snmp 5.6
Zhu Yanjun
On 08/19/2013 12:58 PM, zhuyj wrote:
Hi,
I run the following commands:
--snmpset -c NETMAN -v 2c 128.224.162.243
SNMP-TARGET-MIB::snmpTargetParamsRowStatus.0.25 i 5
SNMP-TARGET-MIB::snmpTargetParamsRowStatus.'..' = INTEGER:
createAndWait(5)
--snmpget -c NETMAN -v 2c 128.224.162.243
SNMP
Hi, Magnus
Please help me to merge this patch into trunk. Thanks a lot.
Best Regards!
Zhu Yanjun
On 08/19/2013 12:58 PM, zhuyj wrote:
Hi,
I run the following commands:
--snmpset -c NETMAN -v 2c 128.224.162.243
SNMP-TARGET-MIB::snmpTargetParamsRowStatus.0.25 i 5
SNMP-TARGET-MIB
Hi,
Any update?
Best Regards!
zhuyj
On 08/20/2013 10:23 AM, zhuyj wrote:
Hi, maintainers
Would you like to comment on this patch? Thanks a lot.
Best Regards!
zhuyj
On 08/19/2013 03:30 PM, zhuyj wrote:
Hi, maintainers
This patch is similar with snmpTargetAddr patch. Would you like
Hi, maintainers
This patch is similar with snmpTargetAddr patch. Would you like to merge
this patch into trunk?
Best Regards!
zhuyj
On 08/19/2013 12:58 PM, zhuyj wrote:
Hi,
I run the following commands:
--snmpset -c NETMAN -v 2c 128.224.162.243
SNMP-TARGET-MIB::snmpTargetParamsRowStatus
Hi, maintainers
Would you like to comment on this patch? Thanks a lot.
Best Regards!
zhuyj
On 08/19/2013 03:30 PM, zhuyj wrote:
Hi, maintainers
This patch is similar with snmpTargetAddr patch. Would you like to
merge this patch into trunk?
Best Regards!
zhuyj
On 08/19/2013 12:58 PM
.1.3.6.1.6.3.12.1.3.1.7.0.25 = INTEGER: notReady(3)
Now I attached the patch in the attachment. Please check it.
Would you like to merge this patch into trunk?
Best Regards!
Zhuyj
diff -urpN net-snmp-5.7.2/agent/mibgroup/notification/snmpNotifyTable.c net-snmp-5.7.2_new/agent/mibgroup
What can I do for you about this problem?
Best Regards!
zhuyj
On 07/22/2013 04:13 PM, zhuyj wrote:
On 07/20/2013 06:49 PM, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
On Fri, 2013-07-19 at 16:09 +0800, zhuyj wrote:
Would you like to give me some advice to make this patch better?
I could do a partial commit
Hi, maintainer
Would you like to merge this patch into main line?
Or you have any concern, please let me know.
Best Regards.
Zhu Yanjun
On 07/25/2013 11:00 AM, zhuyj wrote:
This patch can fix this problem. Would you like to accept this patch?
Best Regards!
Zhuyj
On 07/25/2013 10:55 AM
On 07/31/2013 01:11 PM, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
On Wed, 2013-07-31 at 11:23 +0800, zhuyj wrote:
Hi, maintainer
Would you like to merge this patch into main line?
Or you have any concern, please let me know.
Yes - I do have a concern. You have carefully described how to reproduce
the problem
1. create a new file called /etc/snmp/snmptrapd.conf
---Content--
###
#
# snmptrapd.conf
#
# - created by the snmpconf configuration program
#
This patch can fix this problem. Would you like to accept this patch?
Best Regards!
Zhuyj
On 07/25/2013 10:55 AM, zhuyj wrote:
1. create a new file called /etc/snmp/snmptrapd.conf
---Content
On 07/20/2013 06:49 PM, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
On Fri, 2013-07-19 at 16:09 +0800, zhuyj wrote:
Would you like to give me some advice to make this patch better?
I could do a partial commit of a corrected patch that covers the indices
in snmpTargetAddrTable right now, but that leaves
On 07/20/2013 06:49 PM, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
On Fri, 2013-07-19 at 16:09 +0800, zhuyj wrote:
Would you like to give me some advice to make this patch better?
I could do a partial commit of a corrected patch that covers the indices
in snmpTargetAddrTable right now, but that leaves
Would you like to give me some advice to make this patch better?
On 07/16/2013 04:49 PM, zhuyj wrote:
Hi, Magnus
Based on your patch, I made a new patch. This patch depends on
net-snmp5.7.2.
I made the following modifications compared with your patch:
1.add strdup2 to replace strdup;
2
is in the attachment. Please check it.
Best Regards!
zhuyj
On 07/16/2013 02:14 PM, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
On Tue, 2013-07-16 at 10:27 +0800, zhuyj wrote:
Thanks for your help!
I agree with you. It is a big task to replace all the NUL-terminated
string with counted-string.
Now I have a patch
Hi,
Please give some advice about this patch.
Thanks.
Best Regards!
zhuyj
On 07/16/2013 04:49 PM, zhuyj wrote:
Hi, Magnus
Based on your patch, I made a new patch. This patch depends on
net-snmp5.7.2.
I made the following modifications compared with your patch:
1.add strdup2 to replace
Any advice?
On 07/16/2013 04:49 PM, zhuyj wrote:
Hi, Magnus
Based on your patch, I made a new patch. This patch depends on
net-snmp5.7.2.
I made the following modifications compared with your patch:
1.add strdup2 to replace strdup;
2.modify addToList function;
3.change some NUL
)
.1.3.6.1.6.3.12.1.2.1.9.1.25.1.1.1 = INTEGER: notReady(3)
.1.3.6.1.6.3.12.1.2.1.9.1.26 = INTEGER: notReady(3)
.1.3.6.1.6.3.12.1.2.1.9.1.27 = INTEGER: notReady(3)
.1.3.6.1.6.3.12.1.2.1.9.6.2 = INTEGER: notReady(3)
Best Regards!
zhuyj
On 07/17/2013 10:23 AM, zhuyj wrote:
Any advice?
On 07/16/2013 04:49 PM, zhuyj
Thanks for your help!
I agree with you. It is a big task to replace all the NUL-terminated
string with counted-string.
Now I have a patch that can fix this. Would you like to merge this patch
in master of net-snmp?
zhuyj
On 07/15/2013 09:29 PM, Bill Fenner wrote:
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 6:39
-rowStatus = RS_ACTIVE;
ptr-sess = ss;
zhuyj
On 07/11/2013 01:50 PM, zhuyj wrote:
Hi,
in snprintf, we do not consider that 0 is in nameData. strdup(cptr)
does not include that 0 is in cptr.
So we should rewrite this.
@@ -372,7 +366,8 @@ snmpTargetAddr_addName(struct
Hi, Magnus Niels
Thanks for your help! I am testing your patch. This patch can solve the
most problems.
But Ihave a question, is this a bug? I mean that '0' in snmpAdminString
is a bug, or not?
Would you like to discuss this with me?
zhuyj
On 07/10/2013 04:53 PM, Magnus Fromreide wrote
Hi,
If I fix all the problems, do you want to merge this patch into master?
zhuyj
On 07/11/2013 05:29 PM, zhuyj wrote:
Hi,
something is wrong with these modifications. The root cause is that
strdup handles string as normal string. We should rewrite strdup
function.
@@ -325,7 +326,8
On 07/10/2013 02:04 PM, zhuyj wrote:
On 07/10/2013 01:41 PM, Niels Baggesen wrote:
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 10:34:05AM +0800, zhuyj wrote:
root@localhost:/root snmpset -v 2c -c public 192.168.2.15
.1.3.6.1.6.3.12.1.2.1.9.0.25 i 5
SNMP-TARGET-MIB::snmpTargetAddrRowStatus.'..' = INTEGER
On 07/10/2013 03:22 PM, zhuyj wrote:
On 07/10/2013 02:04 PM, zhuyj wrote:
On 07/10/2013 01:41 PM, Niels Baggesen wrote:
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 10:34:05AM +0800, zhuyj wrote:
root@localhost:/root snmpset -v 2c -c public 192.168.2.15
.1.3.6.1.6.3.12.1.2.1.9.0.25 i 5
SNMP-TARGET-MIB
OK. Thanks a lot.
I will make tests about this.
Zhuyj
On 07/10/2013 04:53 PM, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
On Wed, 2013-07-10 at 10:34 +0800, zhuyj wrote:
Hi,
Attempting to create a new entry with a zero index fails silently.
Ok, You want to index your entry with the string NULEM.
The mess up
On 07/10/2013 04:53 PM, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
On Wed, 2013-07-10 at 10:34 +0800, zhuyj wrote:
Hi,
Attempting to create a new entry with a zero index fails silently.
Ok, You want to index your entry with the string NULEM.
The mess up is, just as usual, that people believes that NUL
On 07/10/2013 04:53 PM, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
On Wed, 2013-07-10 at 10:34 +0800, zhuyj wrote:
Hi,
Attempting to create a new entry with a zero index fails silently.
Ok, You want to index your entry with the string NULEM.
The mess up is, just as usual, that people believes that NUL
Hi,
After I applied this patch, the following is the test result.
When we made the name bigger than 2, we can not snmpwalk it.
I will look into it.
Zhuyj
user@ubuntu1004:~/net-snmp-5.7.2$ snmpwalk -v 2c -c NETMAN 127.0.0.1
.1.3.6.1.6.3.12.1.2.1.9 -Ofn
.1.3.6.1.6.3.12.1.2.1.9.0.25 = INTEGER
Hi,
But snmpget can work well.
user@ubuntu1004:~/net-snmp-5.7.2$ snmpget -v 2c -c NETMAN 127.0.0.1
.1.3.6.1.6.3.12.1.2.1.9.0.25.1 -Ofn
.1.3.6.1.6.3.12.1.2.1.9.0.25.1 = INTEGER: notReady(3)
zhuyj
On 07/10/2013 06:54 PM, zhuyj wrote:
Hi,
After I applied this patch, the following is the test
Hi
name is .0.25.1, we can not snmpwalk it. But .3.25.1, we can snmpwalk it.
Maybe it is related with 0. I will look into it.
zhuyj
user@ubuntu1004:~/net-snmp-5.7.2$ snmpset -v 2c -c NETMAN 127.0.0.1
.1.3.6.1.6.3.12.1.2.1.9.3.25.1 i 5
SNMP-TARGET-MIB::snmpTargetAddrRowStatus.'...' = INTEGER
(line)],
zhuyj
On 07/10/2013 07:17 PM, zhuyj wrote:
Hi
name is .0.25.1, we can not snmpwalk it. But .3.25.1, we can snmpwalk it.
Maybe it is related with 0. I will look into it.
zhuyj
user@ubuntu1004:~/net-snmp-5.7.2$ snmpset -v 2c -c NETMAN 127.0.0.1
.1.3.6.1.6.3.12.1.2.1.9.3.25.1 i 5
SNMP
:~$ snmpget --version
NET-SNMP version: 5.7.2
usr@ubuntu1004:~$ snmpd --version
NET-SNMP version: 5.7.2
Web: http://www.net-snmp.org/
Email: net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
I want to support 0.25 in snmpAdminString. What should I pay attention to?
Best regards.
zhuyj
On 07/10/2013 10:34 AM, zhuyj wrote:
Hi,
Attempting to create a new entry with a zero index fails silently.
root@localhost:/root snmpset -v 2c -c public 192.168.2.15
.1.3.6.1.6.3.12.1.2.1.9.0.25 i 5
SNMP-TARGET-MIB::snmpTargetAddrRowStatus.'..' = INTEGER: createAndWait(5)
root@localhost
On 07/10/2013 10:44 AM, zhuyj wrote:
On 07/10/2013 10:34 AM, zhuyj wrote:
Hi,
Attempting to create a new entry with a zero index fails silently.
root@localhost:/root snmpset -v 2c -c public 192.168.2.15
.1.3.6.1.6.3.12.1.2.1.9.0.25 i 5
SNMP-TARGET-MIB::snmpTargetAddrRowStatus
On 07/10/2013 01:35 PM, zhuyj wrote:
On 07/10/2013 10:44 AM, zhuyj wrote:
On 07/10/2013 10:34 AM, zhuyj wrote:
Hi,
Attempting to create a new entry with a zero index fails silently.
root@localhost:/root snmpset -v 2c -c public 192.168.2.15
.1.3.6.1.6.3.12.1.2.1.9.0.25 i 5
SNMP-TARGET-MIB
53 matches
Mail list logo
