On Tue, May 7, 2019 at 7:41 PM Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 5/7/19 9:42 AM, Bill Fenner wrote:
> > I was hoping you might have an idea of a more graceful solution that
> > allows keeping const'ness. If not, I can check in my change.
>
> Hi Bill,
>
> Please have a look at commit 068b4686739c
On 5/7/19 9:42 AM, Bill Fenner wrote:
> I was hoping you might have an idea of a more graceful solution that
> allows keeping const'ness. If not, I can check in my change.
Hi Bill,
Please have a look at commit 068b4686739c ("libsnmp: Rework the
MDblock() implementation").
Thanks,
Bart.
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 7:10 PM Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Mon, 2019-04-29 at 17:19 -0400, Bill Fenner wrote:
>
> On Sun, Apr 28, 2019 at 7:52 PM net-snmp Git repository <
> nore...@code.net-snmp.p.re.sourceforge.net> wrote:
>
> Branch: V5-8-patches
>
> configure: Determine endianness at
On Mon, 2019-04-29 at 17:19 -0400, Bill Fenner wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 28, 2019 at 7:52 PM net-snmp Git repository
> wrote:
> > Branch: V5-8-patches
> >
> >
> > configure: Determine endianness at compile time instead of at configure time
> >
> > The new test supports cross-compilation. In other
On Sun, Apr 28, 2019 at 7:52 PM net-snmp Git repository <
nore...@code.net-snmp.p.re.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> Branch: V5-8-patches
>
> configure: Determine endianness at compile time instead of at configure
> time
>
> The new test supports cross-compilation. In other words, --with-endianness
>
