On Sat, 04 Sep 2010 02:01:22 +0200, Thomas Anders
thomas.and...@blue-cable.de said:
TA What about Robert's proposal to add a DEBUGMSG if the file/process
TA went away?
New patches to review welcomed :-)
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
On Thu, 02 Sep 2010 14:32:06 -0700 Wes wrote:
WH
WH Ok, here's a now copy that checks all fopens and fgets:
+1
--
This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by:
Show off your parallel programming skills.
Enter the Intel(R)
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 5:32 PM, Robert Story rst...@freesnmp.com wrote:
On Thu, 02 Sep 2010 14:32:06 -0700 Wes wrote:
WH
WH Ok, here's a now copy that checks all fopens and fgets:
+1
+1
Bart.
--
This SF.net
Wes Hardaker wrote::
Ok, here's a now copy that checks all fopens and fgets:
Error handling gets +2. :-)
What about Robert's proposal to add a DEBUGMSG if the file/process went away?
+Thomas
--
This SF.net Dev2Dev
