On Wed 2017-12-20 12:38:22-0500 Bill wrote:
> > On Wed 2017-12-20 12:13:48-0500 Bill wrote:
> > > > The attached patch against master builds with and without TLS
> > > > transports on CentOS 6 (openssl 1.0) and Fedora 27 (openssl
> > > > 1.1).
>
> Thanks! I'll note that this still results in
On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 12:22 PM, Robert Story wrote:
> On Wed 2017-12-20 12:13:48-0500 Bill wrote:
> > > The attached patch against master builds with and without TLS
> > > transports on CentOS 6 (openssl 1.0) and Fedora 27 (openssl 1.1).
> >
> > Can you attach "git show" instead of "git log", o
On Wed 2017-12-20 12:13:48-0500 Bill wrote:
> > The attached patch against master builds with and without TLS
> > transports on CentOS 6 (openssl 1.0) and Fedora 27 (openssl 1.1).
>
> Can you attach "git show" instead of "git log", or point me to your
> repo if it's public and I'll cherry-pick you
On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 12:01 PM, Robert Story wrote:
> On Wed 2017-12-20 10:51:07-0500 Robert wrote:
> > On Wed 2017-12-20 08:42:19-0500 Bill wrote:
> > > I've attached a patch that at least compiles that pulls the compat
> > > functions that snmpusm needs into the new #if, dunno if you have a
>
On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 10:51 AM, Robert Story wrote:
> On Wed 2017-12-20 08:42:19-0500 Bill wrote:
> > I've attached a patch that at least compiles that pulls the compat
> > functions that snmpusm needs into the new #if, dunno if you have a
> > better idea. I haven't tested it with TLS transpor
On Wed 2017-12-20 10:51:07-0500 Robert wrote:
> On Wed 2017-12-20 08:42:19-0500 Bill wrote:
> > I've attached a patch that at least compiles that pulls the compat
> > functions that snmpusm needs into the new #if, dunno if you have a
> > better idea. I haven't tested it with TLS transports.
>
>
On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 10:24 AM, Bart Van Assche
wrote:
> On 12/20/17 05:42, Bill Fenner wrote:
>
>> I've attached a patch that at least compiles that pulls the compat
>> functions that snmpusm needs into the new #if, dunno if you have a better
>> idea. I haven't tested it with TLS transports.
On Wed 2017-12-20 08:42:19-0500 Bill wrote:
> I've attached a patch that at least compiles that pulls the compat
> functions that snmpusm needs into the new #if, dunno if you have a
> better idea. I haven't tested it with TLS transports.
I thins that snmp_openssl. c is the right place for any nee
On 12/20/17 05:42, Bill Fenner wrote:
I've attached a patch that at least compiles that pulls the compat
functions that snmpusm needs into the new #if, dunno if you have a
better idea. I haven't tested it with TLS transports.
Hello Bill,
I would like to have as few dependencies on the NETSNM
Well, for the compat functions that snmpusm needs, we need
+#include
+#include
which is easy if we naively assume that the headers are protected against
multi-inclusion. And there are more compat functions in this file, that
need more headers to build, that snmpusm doesn't. Some errors:
snmp
On 12/19/17 10:36, Bill Fenner wrote:
> snmplib/netsnmp-openssl.c is not built unless HAVE_LIBSSL is defined,
> which is only defined if the TLS transports are used. After the removal
> of the compat functions from apps/snmpusm.c, if you build with only USM
> transports, there is nothing to pro
snmplib/netsnmp-openssl.c is not built unless HAVE_LIBSSL is defined, which
is only defined if the TLS transports are used. After the removal of the
compat functions from apps/snmpusm.c, if you build with only USM
transports, there is nothing to provide the DH_get0_pqg compatibility
function.
B
12 matches
Mail list logo
