RE: Defining MIB

2010-03-08 Thread Dominique bastien
A god book for this is "Understanding SNMP MIBs" ISBN 0-13-437708-7 I personally found a lot of explanations and the nested table example. --- On Mon, 3/8/10, Prakash wrote: > From: Prakash > Subject: RE: Defining MIB > To: "'Robert Story'" >

RE: Defining MIB

2010-03-08 Thread Prakash
Can you please give an example... -Original Message- From: Robert Story [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, March 08, 2010 8:57 PM To: PrakashRaju Meka Cc: [email protected]; 'Fulko Hew' Subject: Re: Defining MIB On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 16:54:01 +05

Re: Defining MIB

2010-03-08 Thread Robert Story
On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 16:54:01 +0530 Prakash wrote: P> Is SNMP support nested tables? No, but you can use the index of one table as the first of 2 or more indexes in the second table, which sort of approximates nested tables. --

RE: Defining MIB

2010-03-08 Thread Prakash
Thank you to all, When we use OBJECT-GROUP ?. Is SNMP support nested tables? From: Fulko Hew [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, March 05, 2010 7:42 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Defining MIB On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 8:58 AM, Dave Shield wrote

Re: Defining MIB

2010-03-05 Thread Fulko Hew
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 8:58 AM, Dave Shield wrote: > On 5 March 2010 13:42, Fulko Hew wrote: > > The closest merge to your original request would be the following > > > > > >abc OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { application 1 } > >xyz OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { application 2 }

Re: Defining MIB

2010-03-05 Thread Dave Shield
On 5 March 2010 13:42, Fulko Hew wrote: > The closest merge to your original request would be the following > > >        abc     OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::=  {  application  1  } >        xyz     OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::=  {  application  2  } > >        noOfMessages    OBJECT-TYPE >                SYNTAX  

Re: Defining MIB

2010-03-05 Thread Fulko Hew
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 7:51 AM, Prakash wrote: > > Thanks Dave, > > I have two mibs as below and I want to merge them into a single MIB. > According to your original definitions, > ABC-MIB := > >abc OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { application 1 } > ... snip ... > XYZ-MIB := > >

Re: Defining MIB

2010-03-05 Thread Dave Shield
On 5 March 2010 12:51, Prakash wrote: > I have two mibs as below and I want to merge them into a single MIB. > > ABC-MIB := > = > >        abc     OBJECT IDENTIFIER >                ::=  {  application  1  } > XYZ-MIB := >

RE: Defining MIB

2010-03-05 Thread Prakash
Thanks Dave, I have two mibs as below and I want to merge them into a single MIB. ABC-MIB := = . . abc OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { application 1 } noOfMessagesOB

Re: Defining MIB

2010-02-15 Thread Dave Shield
On 15 February 2010 11:11, Prakash wrote: > But I want to access the object as > "privete(4).enterprise(1).abc(16142).newyork(3).machine(1).app(id).noOfMessa > gesPending(1)" not like > "privete(4).enterprise(1).abc(16142).newyork(3).machine(1).noOfMessagesPendi > ng(1). app(id)" leaf node should

RE: Defining MIB

2010-02-15 Thread Prakash
1). regards Prakash -Original Message- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dave Shield Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2010 4:27 PM To: PrakashRaju Meka Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: Defining MIB On 11 February 2010 10:53, Prakash

Re: Defining MIB

2010-02-11 Thread Dave Shield
On 11 February 2010 10:53, Prakash wrote: > There are many instances of apps and each instance have unique id which is > dynamically created > question Is how to create dynamic oid's instead of defining statically in a > MIB. Use a MIB table. Presumably the information held about each app is cons

RE: Defining MIB

2010-02-11 Thread Prakash
[email protected] Subject: Re: Defining MIB On 10 February 2010 09:58, Prakash wrote: > Hi Dave, Please address queries to the list as a whole - not to me personally. I am *not* the sole support for this project (though it sometimes feels like it!) > How to define a MIB for the following structur

Re: Defining MIB

2010-02-10 Thread Dave Shield
On 10 February 2010 09:58, Prakash wrote: > Hi Dave, Please address queries to the list as a whole - not to me personally. I am *not* the sole support for this project (though it sometimes feels like it!) > How to define a MIB for the following structure. What do you have at the moment? > …p

Defining MIB

2010-02-10 Thread Prakash
Hi Dave, How to define a MIB for the following structure. .privete(4).enterprise(1).abc(16142).newyork(3).machine(1).app(4).noOfMessag esPending; .privete(4).enterprise(1).abc(16142).newyork(3).machine(1).app(4).noOfMessag esSent; .privete(4).enterprise(1).abc(16142).newyork(3).machine(1).app(3)