In my eternal quest for warnings I now hit snmpksm, which did not even
compile on my standard CentOS setups :-(
I would like to solicit some input on the changes that I made to get it
to compile and quell warnings, so would some of you who has a Kerberos
setup please look at the attached dif?
On Wed, 2011-02-23 at 22:38 +0100, Niels Baggesen wrote:
In my eternal quest for warnings I now hit snmpksm, which did not even
compile on my standard CentOS setups :-(
I would like to solicit some input on the changes that I made to get it
to compile and quell warnings, so would some of
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 11:22:16PM +0100, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
Chunk 4 looks marvelous. How did this ever compile?
I have no idea if this ever compiled :-) It is certainly some years
ago last time
Chunk 5-12: Why print lengths as signed integers?
Lazyness. Then you only have to change one
On Wed, 2011-02-23 at 23:31 +0100, Niels Baggesen wrote:
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 11:22:16PM +0100, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
Chunk 4 looks marvelous. How did this ever compile?
I have no idea if this ever compiled :-) It is certainly some years
ago last time
:-)
Chunk 5-12: Why print
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 12:01:32AM +0100, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
There is the third option as well:
% NETSNMP_PRIz u, LENGTH_something
The drawback is that it is even longer but the advantage is that it is
correct on both 32 and 64-bit platforms, but then, so are the other two
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 23:31:11 +0100, Niels Baggesen
n...@users.sourceforge.net said:
NB On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 11:22:16PM +0100, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
Chunk 4 looks marvelous. How did this ever compile?
NB I have no idea if this ever compiled :-) It is certainly some years
NB ago last time
