On 10/12/2007, Giuseppe Modugno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Scalar helper is based on instance handler, so it is serialized too.
> Is it correct?
Err... probably, yes.
> > > When I register a custom scalar or a group of scalar, what should I write
> > > in
> > > the MODE_GET case (but also in
2007/12/10, Dave Shield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 10/12/2007, Giuseppe Modugno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The fourth parameter of an handler is netsnmp_request_info type.
> > This appears as a list of requests
>
> Correct.
> This is the list of varbinds from the incoming request that are
> rele
On 10/12/2007, Giuseppe Modugno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The fourth parameter of an handler is netsnmp_request_info type.
> This appears as a list of requests
Correct.
This is the list of varbinds from the incoming request that are
relevant to this particular handler.
> Another field is 'net
The fourth parameter of an handler is netsnmp_request_info type.
This appears as a list of requests, in fact there are 'next' and 'prev' field.
Another field is 'netsnmp_variable_list *requestvb' that is a list of variable
bindings.
I don't understand why there are two lists: requests (netsnmp_re
The fourth parameter of an handler is netsnmp_request_info type.
This appears as a list of requests, in fact there are 'next' and 'prev' field.
Another field is 'netsnmp_variable_list *requestvb' that is a list of variable
bindings.
I don't understand why there are two lists: requests (netsnmp_re
