Hi All
My original version of net-snmp agent is ver: 5.2.5.1
I have compiled ver:5.5 and replaced my old snmp agent in my linux system.
After some test,I found new version can't receive traffic info if my
interface index id was changed.
But ver:5.2.5.1 can work fine with original interface index i
Hi,
In cache_free i used, CONTAINER_FREE (container); call. but that gives
me
segmentation fault.
Latter i thought, where index is being register, if that is freed may work.
Therefor before going to loop and calling se_find_value_in_slist and
se_add_pair_to_slist for index. i used se_c
All,
in snmplib/container_binary_array.c: netsnmp_binary_array_release() ,
binary_array_table *t = (binary_array_table*)c->container_data;
if (t->data != NULL) {
SNMP_FREE(t->data);
}
SNMP_FREE(t);
SNMP_FREE(c);
is it fine to free t->data as above, since it is a void**
Hi Guys,
snmpd is not able clear cache (container), I guess. I used mib2c tool
to
generate codes.
Once i run snmpwalk, I got
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.5713.2.10.15.40.1.1.2 = INTEGER: 2
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.5713.2.10.15.40.1.1.4 = INTEGER: 4
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.5713.2.10.15.40.1.2.2
On 07/05/07, Senthil Nathan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have an general query,
> In SNMP MIB table ,the indexing is dynamic?
What exactly do you mean by that?
The style of indexing (how many index values, and what type - single
integer, multi-dimensional, strings, etc) is fixed, and defined
Hi ,
I have an general query,
In SNMP MIB table ,the indexing is dynamic?
presently i am using mib2c iterator config,net-snmp style of code. I have
followed the position count as loop context.I have made the index as fixed. is
it possible for dynamic ?
Secondly, when i make the Get-bulk or walk
