Paul> not supposed to be used by users of libnetsnmp? The man page is also, I
Paul> think, very unclear with respect to the use of the snmp_sess_read and
Paul> how one actually gets the inbound pdu out of it.
I think our man pages need a lot of work, and have for a long time.
No, the APIs
Hello all,
I recently had to work on an SNMP project at my company. While my team
was able to get everything working eventually, there were a number of
confusing issues surrounding the documentation in the man pages.
Is there a reason that the synch_resp calls are not mentioned in the man
On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 07:45:03PM +0100, Patrick Welche wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 06:25:12PM -0400, Robert Story wrote:
> > On Wed, 12 Oct 2005 16:48:56 +0100 Patrick wrote:
> > PW> There isn't a gamble: the older version don't use datarootdir, so
> > PW> all that happens is you end up with
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 06:25:12PM -0400, Robert Story wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Oct 2005 16:48:56 +0100 Patrick wrote:
> PW> There isn't a gamble: the older version don't use datarootdir, so
> PW> all that happens is you end up with
> PW>
> PW> datarootdir=
>
> No, if autoconf hasn't been updated, you
On Wed, 12 Oct 2005 16:48:56 +0100 Patrick wrote:
PW> There isn't a gamble: the older version don't use datarootdir, so
PW> all that happens is you end up with
PW>
PW> datarootdir=
No, if autoconf hasn't been updated, you'd end up with
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@
and I'm less sure what various versions
Patrick Welche wrote:
There isn't a gamble: the older version don't use datarootdir, so
all that happens is you end up with
datarootdir=
in your Makefile :-)
Agreed, this was my gut reaction also. But since we supply the generated
configure in CVS, there's no general need to use autoconf any
On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 01:42:57PM -0400, Robert Story wrote:
> On Sat, 8 Oct 2005 17:43:16 +0100 Patrick wrote:
> PW> I find I need the attached patch (attached as it includes tabs) to stop
> PW> the man pages and mibs from being installed in /. It could be because I
> PW>
On Sat, 2005-10-08 at 17:43 +0100, Patrick Welche wrote:
> I find I need the attached patch (attached as it includes tabs) to stop
> the man pages and mibs from being installed in /. It could be because I
> am using fairly new autotools, but it boils down to Makefile containing
>
&
On Sat, 8 Oct 2005 17:43:16 +0100 Patrick wrote:
PW> I find I need the attached patch (attached as it includes tabs) to stop
PW> the man pages and mibs from being installed in /. It could be because I
PW> am using fairly new autotools,
indeed. What versions are you using? I don'
I find I need the attached patch (attached as it includes tabs) to stop
the man pages and mibs from being installed in /. It could be because I
am using fairly new autotools, but it boils down to Makefile containing
datarootdir = ${prefix}/share
datadir = ${datarootdir}
mandir
Alex Burger wrote:
About 45 of the man pages have what appears to be invalid titles. For
example, netsnmp_leaf.3 has:
.TH "leaf_handlers: process individual leaf objects" 3 "2 Sep 2004"
"net-snmp" \" -*- nroff -*-
It looks like the man page above was genera
About 45 of the man pages have what appears to be invalid titles. For
example, netsnmp_leaf.3 has:
.TH "leaf_handlers: process individual leaf objects" 3 "2 Sep 2004"
"net-snmp" \" -*- nroff -*-
A 'man netsnmp_leaf' on Linux gives:
***
On Wed, 11 Aug 2004 12:57:51 +0100 Dave wrote:
DS> > I know there has been a thread going on man pages, but with the CVS code
DS> > downloaded last night I get the following on make install;
DS> [snip]
DS> > Maybe that has been fixed.
DS>
DS> It was fixed on th
> I know there has been a thread going on man pages, but with the CVS code
> downloaded last night I get the following on make install;
[snip]
> Maybe that has been fixed.
It was fixed on the 5.1.x line.
I've just applied the same fix to the main development line as well.
I know there has been a thread going on man pages, but with the CVS code
downloaded last night I get the following on make install;
make[1]: Entering directory `/home/luser/src/net-snmp-linux/man'
make[1]: *** No rule to make target `netsnmp_todo.3', needed by
`maninstall'
Dave> I'd suggest that the simplest thing would be either to drop these
Dave> particular man pages from the distribution, or else have a special
Dave> "sed" (or similar) script to paste in the missing formatting.
Wes> Well, I doubt we need to install them by de
This is automatically generated email about problems in a man page for which
you appear to be responsible. If you are not the right person or list, tell
me and I will attempt to correct my database.
See http://catb.org/~esr/doclifter/problems.html for details on how and
why these patches were gen
Dave Shield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I note that the "normal" man pages that doxygen spits out look
> reasonable (though I'd like to tweak the descriptions at some point).
> It's just these "specials" (todo, deprecated and probably bug) that
> seem
>>>>> On Mon, 02 Aug 2004 10:07:55 +0100, Dave Shield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Dave> I'd suggest that the simplest thing would be either to drop these
Dave> particular man pages from the distribution, or else have a special
Dave> "sed" (or simil
this report last week,
and even started ploughing through the doxygen source
to see how these particular man pages are generated.
(Without much luck)
I note that the "normal" man pages that doxygen spits out look
reasonable (though I'd like to tweak the descriptions at some point)
Wes Hardaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On Thu, 22 Jul 2004 14:32:10 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>
> esr> Note: This patch does not change the mod date of the manual page. You
> esr> may wish to do that by hand.
>
> Err... that manual page is auto generated from doxygen. Adding in
> the .
> On Thu, 22 Jul 2004 14:32:10 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
esr> Note: This patch does not change the mod date of the manual page. You
esr> may wish to do that by hand.
Err... that manual page is auto generated from doxygen. Adding in
the .SH token will get it overwritten by future doxyg
This is automatically generated email about problems in a man page for which
you appear to be responsible. If you are not the right person or list, tell
me and I will attempt to correct my database.
See http://catb.org/~esr/doclifter/problems.html for details on how and
why these patches were gen
> This is automatically generated email about problems in a man page
> for which you appear to be responsible.
> Problems with snmpvacm.1:
>
> 1. Unknown or invalid macro.
Thanks for that. The suggested fix has been applied,
and should be included in the next release of the software
(which is du
This is automatically generated email about problems in a man page for which
you appear to be responsible. If you are not the right person or list, tell
me and I will attempt to correct my database.
See http://catb.org/~esr/doclifter/problems.html for details on how and
why these patches were gen
25 matches
Mail list logo
