Dear Dave
Thank you very very much
It worked, that was my mistake.
Thank you again
Reddy
Dave Shield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 27/11/06, Venkata Guddeti wrote:
> Even if I switch the order of variables, the problem is with the 2nd variable.
That sounds like the handler isn't properly
Forgot to mention, for some snmpd gives the same value for both the var binds
in case of integer variables. (setting two table vars in one PDU)
Thanks
Reddy
Note: forwarded message attached.--- Begin Message ---
Dear All
Yes, Even if I switch the order of variables, the problem is with the
Dear All
Yes, Even if I switch the order of variables, the problem is with the 2nd
variable.
After more investigation in to this problem, I understood that set is not
working if I try to set values for any two variables of a table in one PDU.
I am attaching the code here in a file tables_gbb
On 27/11/06, Venkata Guddeti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Even if I switch the order of variables, the problem is with the 2nd variable.
That sounds like the handler isn't properly working through the list
of varbind that it's given.
> I am attaching the code here in a file tables_gbbfcommn.c:
On 21/11/06, Venkata Guddeti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When the snmpd receives one PDU with set for two variables in a table, my
> subagent does not get the values for both the variables properly.
>In the subagent, the value range
> check fails and retur
Dear All
I am running Net-SNMP 5.3.1 on 64-bit RHEL 4.0.
When the snmpd receives one PDU with set for two variables in a table, my
subagent does not get the values for both the variables properly. One variable
is an octet string and the other is an integer. These two are only variables
that
