On Fri, 4 May 2018 17:01:05 +0100 Stuart wrote:
SH> On 2018/05/04 10:37, Robert Story wrote:
SH> Personally I think it's a disservice to users to enable them to
SH> run with such an old version of OpenBSD - there's a 2-release
SH> cutoff for important fixes in the base OS and 6 months at the
SH> mo
On Fri, 04 May 2018 10:25:15 -0700 Keith wrote:
KM> I feel that Net-SNMP should follow what the OS maintainers are
KM> willing to support. If they're saying they're only going back 2
KM> versions; I strongly urge the team to cut the support for them
KM> loose.
You will get strong argument from at
I feel that Net-SNMP should follow what the OS maintainers are willing to
support. If they're saying they're only going back 2 versions; I strongly urge
the team to cut the support for them loose. I understand the team's desire to
maintain backwards compatibility; however, we have to consider th
On 2018/05/04 10:37, Robert Story wrote:
> On Fri, 4 May 2018 13:58:43 +0100 Stuart wrote:
> SH> This is needed for OpenBSD 5.6+. It does break older versions
> SH> but 5.6 was released in 2014 and support for this ended Oct
> SH> 2015; I'd find it unlikely that anyone still running this would
> SH
On Fri, 4 May 2018 13:58:43 +0100 Stuart wrote:
SH> This is needed for OpenBSD 5.6+. It does break older versions
SH> but 5.6 was released in 2014 and support for this ended Oct
SH> 2015; I'd find it unlikely that anyone still running this would
SH> be building up-to-date net-snmp.
We try really h
