Re: [net-snmp:code] 2 new commits to Code

2019-07-10 Thread Bart Van Assche
On 7/10/19 9:49 AM, Bill Fenner wrote: On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 9:53 AM Bart Van Assche wrote: Hi Bill,

Re: [net-snmp:code] 2 new commits to Code

2019-07-10 Thread Bill Fenner via Net-snmp-coders
On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 9:53 AM Bart Van Assche wrote: > Hi Bill, > > To avoid confusion: does your comment apply to commit a88d81f1144e > ("NET-SNMP-SYSTEM-MIB, Linux: Update calculation of free space") only or > also to commit 4e3ace87b566 ("NET-SNMP-SYSTEM-MIB: Account reclaimable > space")? >

Re: [net-snmp:code] 2 new commits to Code

2019-07-08 Thread Bart Van Assche
Hi Bill, To avoid confusion: does your comment apply to commit a88d81f1144e ("NET-SNMP-SYSTEM-MIB, Linux: Update calculation of free space") only or also to commit 4e3ace87b566 ("NET-SNMP-SYSTEM-MIB: Account reclaimable space")? Thanks,

Re: [net-snmp:code] 2 new commits to Code

2019-07-08 Thread Bill Fenner via Net-snmp-coders
There's a long history of telling people "You're polling a Linux system, you have to know that you subtract buffers and cached from physical before you report free memory" in the HOST-RESOURCES-MIB. I'm not against simplifying, but - if people have data collection set up for "the old way", where