> On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 10:47:43 +0100, Dave Shield
> said:
DS> I've just commited a set of changes to the include/ tree, which
DS> moves what I would consider to be the heart of the core API into
DS> these top-level header files (together with a reworking of the man
DS> pages to match).
> On Wed, 22 Apr 2009 16:42:45 +0100, Dave Shield
> said:
DS> I can't really comment for the other core developers,
DS> but it's probably fair to say that we all tend to be more
DS> interested in functionality rather than documentation.
Speaking as someone who has done a fair amount of
2009/4/21 Doug Manley :
> I like what you've done, getting the functions grouped nicely at the
> top. It'll provide a much nicer starting point for developers (such
> as myself).
Thanks - that's definitely the idea.
Tidying up the library API (not to mention the library code) is
something that h
Dave,
I like what you've done, getting the functions grouped nicely at the
top. It'll provide a much nicer starting point for developers (such
as myself).
I have a question for the community, however: is there a particular
reason why there are so few comments in the code--at least the
function p
2009/4/21 Bart Van Assche :
> Do you get the same output on a Linux system for the following command:
>
> $ svn update && make -s distclean && ./configure ...
> making all in /home/bart/software/net-snmp-trunk/man
> Makefile:237: *** missing separator (did you mean TAB instead of 8
> spaces?). St
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 11:47 AM, Dave Shield
wrote:
> I've just commited a set of changes to the include/ tree, which moves what I
> would consider to be the heart of the core API into these top-level header
> files (together with a reworking of the man pages to match).
Hello Dave,
Do you get t
