> On Wed, 14 Jul 2004 11:40:34 +0530, "Karthikeyan N" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Karthikeyan> Currently , I am trying to implement the counter64
Karthikeyan> objects in ifXTable ( example : ifHCInOctets). I
Karthikeyan> generated the code in uce-snmp style and it generates the
Karthikeyan> code
> Just want to know one more info. Suppose, If I am using 5.1.1 release
> and want to migrate into 5.1.2 at later stage, how much work will it
> get involved?
What do you mean by "migrate" ?
Anything written against 5.1.1 should continue to work with 5.1.2
and beyond. In the same way that anyt
thik
- Original Message -
From: Dave Shield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 10:41:40 +0100
To: "Karthikeyan N" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Counter64 objects retrieval
>
> > The code I generated for ifXTable is by using the ucd-snmp style.
>
> The code I generated for ifXTable is by using the ucd-snmp style.
>
> Also, I gone through the code for ifXTable implementation in the repository.
> That code is generated using the new style i believe.
Yes.
All new development will use the v5 APIs. The v4-line is dead.
(There will probably b
.
}
}
can you suggest me the above way is correct or do we need to handle it in different
way?
Thanks & Regards,
Karthik
- Original Message -
From: Dave Shield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 10:36:04 +0100
To: "Karthikeyan N" <[EMAIL
> Currently , I am trying to implement the counter64 objects in ifXTable
Just to check - you do know that there is already an implementation
of the ifXTable in the current CVS code ?
(It's part of a long-overdue re-working of the whole IF-MIB code)
> Inside the IFHCINOCTETS case statement I ret
