> GW> In the iterator irreversible_commit
> "CONTAINER_REMOVE" call
> GW> am I responsible for the container -
> "_if_ctx.container" or
> GW> is this an internal thing to Net-SNMP?
>
> RS> That container is the 'iterator container' that is used to
> RS> iterate over your data.
>
> RS> So, un
On Mon, 2 Jul 2007 17:37:27 +0100 Graeme wrote:
GW> Ok, as per my previous email, I've been looking at a table which uses
GW> row-creation, and this is causing a couple of problems - although this
GW> could be related to my implementation because I'm a little unsure about
GW> a couple of things. M
007 11:13
> To: Robert Story
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: Memory leak in agent code using mfd
>
> > RS> Ugh. The iterator style mfd code is the least tested aspect of
> > RS> this code.
>
> Oh well, I guess someone has to be the g
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Robert Story
> Sent: 28 June 2007 18:34
> To: Graeme Wilson
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Memory leak in agent code using mfd
>
> On Thu, 28 Jun 2007 16:46:09 +0100 Grae
On Thu, 28 Jun 2007 16:46:09 +0100 Graeme wrote:
GW> ==12187==by 0x8049EF0: _loop_get_first
GW> (_data_access.c:213)
GW> ==12187==by 0x804C222: __loop_get_first_wrapper
GW> (_interface.c:753)
Ugh. The iterator style mfd code is the least tested aspect of this code.
I've just run through i
