Wes Hardaker wrote:
> The obvious patch is:
+1
+Thomas
--
This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by:
Show off your parallel programming skills.
Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thr
On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 07:22 -0700, Wes Hardaker wrote:
> > On Wed, 01 Sep 2010 08:00:44 +0200, Magnus Fromreide
> > said:
>
> MF> if ((rc =
> netsnmp_sess_config_transport(in_session->transport_configuration,
> MF> transport)) != SNMPERR_SUCCESS) {
> MF> return rc;
> in_session-> s_snmp
On Wed, 01 Sep 2010 07:22:09 -0700 Wes wrote:
WH> Whoops; good catch. It should be the second so the tools print the
WH> right error message when an error is encountered.
WH>
WH> The obvious patch is:
+1
--
This SF.net
> On Wed, 01 Sep 2010 08:00:44 +0200, Magnus Fromreide
> said:
MF> if ((rc = netsnmp_sess_config_transport(in_session->transport_configuration,
MF> transport)) != SNMPERR_SUCCESS) {
MF> return rc;
in_session-> s_snmp_errno = rc;
in_session-> s_errno = 0;
MF> return rc;
MF> }
Whoops; goo
its with the net-snmp-5.6.pre3 release as i found...
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 11:46 AM, rakesh zingade wrote:
> can you mention the snmp version in which you saw this piece of code?
>
> I check 5.5 and 5.4 but unable to find the same..
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 11:30 AM, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 11:46 +0530, rakesh zingade wrote:
> can you mention the snmp version in which you saw this piece of code?
trunk (5.6 to be - so yes, this is new code)
--
This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by:
can you mention the snmp version in which you saw this piece of code?
I check 5.5 and 5.4 but unable to find the same..
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 11:30 AM, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
> In snmp_api.c, at line 1521-1527, there is the following piece of code:
>
>if ((rc =
> netsnmp_sess_config_transp
