Thomas Anders wrote:
> Josef Moellers wrote on 2006-11-03:
>
>>During analysis, I already tried *not* freing certain data structures to
>>see how far I got and the first thing I did was deepcopying a
>>netsnmp_subtree rather than assigning the pointer in
>>netsnmp_add_varbind_to_cache() (reques
Josef Moellers wrote on 2006-11-03:
> During analysis, I already tried *not* freing certain data structures to
> see how far I got and the first thing I did was deepcopying a
> netsnmp_subtree rather than assigning the pointer in
> netsnmp_add_varbind_to_cache() (request->subtree, and later
> r
Dave Shield wrote:
On 02/11/06, Josef Moellers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Can somebody explain to me why, in close_agentx_session(), part of the
session infrastructure is taken down first
(unregister_XXX_by_session()), and _then_ the requests are cleaned up,
rather than the other way round?
Dave Shield wrote:
> On 02/11/06, Josef Moellers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Can somebody explain to me why, in close_agentx_session(), part of the
>> session infrastructure is taken down first
>> (unregister_XXX_by_session()), and _then_ the requests are cleaned up,
>> rather than the other w
On 02/11/06, Josef Moellers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can somebody explain to me why, in close_agentx_session(), part of the
> session infrastructure is taken down first
> (unregister_XXX_by_session()), and _then_ the requests are cleaned up,
> rather than the other way round?
Probably because
