Thomas Anders wrote:
> Chris Black wrote:
>
>> Thomas Anders wrote:
>>
>>> Chris Black wrote:
>>>
I am compiling net-snmp on OpenBSD-4.0 on an amd64 arch (running in
64-bit mode) from ports with the openbsd MIBs patch
(http://www.packetmischief.ca/openbsd/snmp/) applie
Chris Black wrote:
> Thomas Anders wrote:
>> Chris Black wrote:
>>> I am compiling net-snmp on OpenBSD-4.0 on an amd64 arch (running in
>>> 64-bit mode) from ports with the openbsd MIBs patch
>>> (http://www.packetmischief.ca/openbsd/snmp/) applied. During autoconf I
>>> got the following warning t
Thomas Anders wrote:
> Chris Black wrote:
>
>> I am compiling net-snmp on OpenBSD-4.0 on an amd64 arch (running in
>> 64-bit mode) from ports with the openbsd MIBs patch
>> (http://www.packetmischief.ca/openbsd/snmp/) applied. During autoconf I
>> got the following warning that seemed to indicat
Chris Black wrote:
> I am compiling net-snmp on OpenBSD-4.0 on an amd64 arch (running in
> 64-bit mode) from ports with the openbsd MIBs patch
> (http://www.packetmischief.ca/openbsd/snmp/) applied. During autoconf I
> got the following warning that seemed to indicate I should notify this
> list, s
Alexander Czigler wrote:
> uname: FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE #0: Sun May 7 04:32:43
> UTC 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386
>
> checking sys/conf.h presence... yes
> configure: WARNING: sys/conf.h: present but cannot be compiled
Whci hnet-snmp version? Sh
> On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 16:00:05 -0700, "Kane Estess" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
Kane> Don't know exactly what this means, but the directions were
Kane> clear, so here it is... Compiled on a late version of Cygwin on
Kane> XP Pro. Anything else I should do?
Nope, thanks for reporting it
