Re: Use of multiple MIB instances

2009-03-04 Thread Dave Shield
2009/3/4 Zé Flash : >   I have still some issues regarding architecture, after discussing with > some colleagues...What is the difference between using "context based > addressing" and using a "proxy forwarder" to connect multiple devices > (sensors), using a switch, while sharing the same stan

Re: Use of multiple MIB instances

2009-03-04 Thread Zé Flash
Hi all! Thanks for your contributions! I have still some issues regarding architecture, after discussing with some colleagues...What is the difference between using "context based addressing" and using a "proxy forwarder" to connect multiple devices (sensors), using a switch, while sha

Re: Use of multiple MIB instances

2009-01-27 Thread Dave Shield
2009/1/22 Zé Flash : > Ok... from what you explained, when I register a new instance of a MIB I > have to specify the context in which I want it to be accessible. But, how > can I announce this "new" context to the management system? How can I say > that there is a new sensor? That's up to the per

Re: Use of multiple MIB instances

2009-01-22 Thread Zé Flash
Ok... from what you explained, when I register a new instance of a MIB I have to specify the context in which I want it to be accessible. But, how can I announce this "new" context to the management system? How can I say that there is a new sensor? Thanks for the prompt answer! ;) On Thu, Jan 22,

Re: Use of multiple MIB instances

2009-01-22 Thread Dave Shield
2009/1/22 Zé Flash : > Is it possible to have multiple instances of the same MIB registered in an > agent? Yes. But obviously, there needs to be some way for the manager to specify *which* version of the MIB they are querying. One approach would be for the various devices to register individual