On 2 January 2011 09:44, sujata patra wrote:
> Issue I am facing is an implementation issue.
> While refreshing the data or loading for the first time , Do I have to load
> the whole tree data to all the tables ?
As you say, this is an implementation issue.
That means you can handle it in wh
From: Wes Hardaker
To: sujata patra
Cc: Wes Hardaker ;
[email protected]
Sent: Wed, December 22, 2010 10:05:34 AM
Subject: Re: doubt in nested table implementation
>>>>> On Tue, 21 Dec 2010 20:15:12 -0800 (PST), sujata pa
From: Wes Hardaker
To: sujata patra
Cc: Wes Hardaker ;
[email protected]
Sent: Wed, December 22, 2010 10:05:34 AM
Subject: Re: doubt in nested table implementation
>>>>> On Tue, 21 Dec 2010 20:15:12 -0800 (PST), sujata pa
: doubt in nested table implementation
From: Wes Hardaker
To: sujata patra
Cc: Wes Hardaker ;
[email protected]
Sent: Wed, December 22, 2010 10:05:34 AM
Subject: Re: doubt in nested table implementation
>>>>> On Tue, 21 De
From: Wes Hardaker
To: sujata patra
Cc: Wes Hardaker ;
[email protected]
Sent: Wed, December 22, 2010 10:05:34 AM
Subject: Re: doubt in nested table implementation
>>>>> On Tue, 21 Dec 2010 20:15:12 -0800 (PST), sujata pa
> On Tue, 21 Dec 2010 20:15:12 -0800 (PST), sujata patra
> said:
sp> Thanks Wes. That's right . I have got it now and able to progress . I was
sp> confused whether to make tree structure .
Tree structures are not supported by SMIv2 (the MIB language). If
you're getting the point of ne
From: Wes Hardaker
To: sujata patra
Cc: [email protected]
Sent: Tue, December 21, 2010 6:11:08 AM
Subject: Re: doubt in nested table implementation
>>>>> On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 02:43:26 -0800 (PST), sujata patra
>>
> On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 02:43:26 -0800 (PST), sujata patra
> said:
sp> I have implemented simple table quite a few times . But I am confused to
sp> implement when the mib contain more than one table and the tables are
sp> nested(means the second table data repeats for each row of firs
