On Sun, 17 Oct 2004 12:33:21 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SN> > > #-#-#-#-#-#-#-#
SN> > > net-snmp-5.0.8-readonly.patch
SN> > > This change to netsnmp_wrap_up_request fixing a problem with
SN> > > processing RO vs RW objects (I'm not sure) was applied in a different
SN> > > source location.
SN> >
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Phil Knirsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
net-snmp-5.0.6-libtool.patch Thanks for adding verbiage from the
bug list on this one. Makes it easier for us to choose.
> From: Phil Knirsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[SNIP]
> Here now my comments/thoughts on the various items.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Hi, coders. Working with the Redhat team to incorporate
> > several of their patches into the main code.
[SNIP]
> > #-#-#-#-#-#-#-#
> >
OK, first of all apologies that this took so long, but i was swamped
with work the last couple of weeks so i just didn't get time enough to
take care of the review.
Here now my comments/thoughts on the various items.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, coders. Working with the Redhat team to incorpora
Magnus Fromreide wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Where could the patches be found for looking at?
>
Hi, Magnus. I'm sorry I didn't provide a vector.
The patches are part of the "src.rpm" package that
RedHat uses to produce the binary RPM packages.
I did a Google search with two keywords
net-snmp-5.1.2
On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 11:41:06 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SN> The sensors patch causes some concern, probably not suitable for us
SN> 1. It modifies HOST-RESOURCES-MIBS -- did your team check with
SN> the current author of this MIB to test the change's correctness?
SN> The Net-SNMP proje
Hi!
Where could the patches be found for looking at?
/MF
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal
Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us
Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek G
