> On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 10:37:39 -0400, Fulko Hew said:
FH> I just tested rc3... and I give that release/patch _my_ blessing.
Thanks for the positive feedback!
FH> Now it would be nice If I could also get my other two patches
FH> incorporated that prevent net-SNMP from core dumping under cert
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 8:22 PM, Wes Hardaker <
[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Thu, 16 Sep 2010 12:41:38 -0400, Fulko Hew
> said:
>
> FH> Are there any other scenarios that I missed testing?
>
> FYI, I applied your patch to the trunk today.
>
Great!
I just tested rc3... and I
> On Thu, 16 Sep 2010 12:41:38 -0400, Fulko Hew said:
FH> Are there any other scenarios that I missed testing?
FYI, I applied your patch to the trunk today.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to [email protected]
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 12:31 PM, Wes Hardaker <
[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Wed, 15 Sep 2010 16:00:42 -0400, Fulko Hew
> said:
>
> FH> WATCHER_MAX_SIZE | WATCHER_SIZE_IS_PTR | WATCHER_SIZE_UNIT_OIDS,
>
> FH> whereas the value passed in via sysObjectIDByteLength has already
> On Wed, 15 Sep 2010 16:00:42 -0400, Fulko Hew said:
FH> WATCHER_MAX_SIZE | WATCHER_SIZE_IS_PTR | WATCHER_SIZE_UNIT_OIDS,
FH> whereas the value passed in via sysObjectIDByteLength has already been
FH> converted
FH> into bytes. so the above statement on line 339
FH> should instead be:
FH>
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 2:52 PM, Fulko Hew wrote:
> As long as I was testing 5.6.rc2, I thought I'd test it to
> see if the 'sysObjectID is truncated' issue was resolved.
>
> What I see is that the value is now returned as padded with zeros.
> I.e.
>
> 1.3.6.1.2.1.1.2.0:
> 1.3.6.1.4.1.8072.3.2.10
On Tue, 2006-02-07 at 14:05 -0800, Fong Tsui wrote:
> Does sysObjectID need to be top OID of MIB of the system?
No.
> My original .1.3.6.1.2.1.1.2 == .1.3.6.1.4.1.XXX.2
> The all MIB of the system is under .1.3.6.1.4.1.XXX.2
Is this from a vendor-supplied agent?
The standard Net-SNMP configurat
Fong Tsui wrote:
Now if I change .1.3.6.1.2.1.1.2 == .1.3.6.1.4.1.XXX.2.1.3.3.2. All
other MIB stays the same.
Will it be a problem?
Not that I'm aware of.
+Thomas
--
Thomas Anders (thomas.anders at blue-cable.de)
---
This SF.net email
