Thanks Wes.
Wes Hardaker wrote:
>> On Wed, 20 Oct 2010 11:15:12 +0530, Manjit
>> said:
>>
>
> M> Yes Wes ...i am trying to understand the concept.
>
> Ah. In that case I'd suggest writing to the SNMPv3 IETF Working Group
> mailing list (which still exists) and ask thos
> On Wed, 20 Oct 2010 11:15:12 +0530, Manjit
> said:
M> Yes Wes ...i am trying to understand the concept.
Ah. In that case I'd suggest writing to the SNMPv3 IETF Working Group
mailing list (which still exists) and ask those sorts of questions there
instead, because that's where the aut
Yes Wes ...i am trying to understand the concept.
As i read in RFC 3412:
a. if reportable flag is 0 for a confirmed class of packets, then also
the receiver should process it as though it had been set to 1.
b . if reportable flag is 1 for a unconfirmed class of packets, then
also the receiver sho
M> I am little confused with the use of reportableFlag bit of msgFlags.
M> As per RFC3412 reportable flag says whether to send a report or not.
M> What should be behaviour of receiver for the below scenario:
M> 1. A Get is send using reportableFlag = 0
M> 2. A trap is send using reportableFlag = 1
Hi All,
I am little confused with the use of reportableFlag bit of msgFlags.
As per RFC3412 reportable flag says whether to send a report or not.
What should be behaviour of receiver for the below scenario:
1. A Get is send using reportableFlag = 0
2. A trap is send using reportableFlag = 1
Regard
