Bruce Shaw wrote:
> It's a speeling mistake.
> It's supposed to be ai.ani_max.
Looks like it. Fixed in SVN Rev. 16368.
+Thomas
--
Thomas Anders (thomas.anders at blue-cable.de)
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Expr
rge.net
Subject: Re: Solaris memTotalFree.0
Dave Shield wrote:
> I've just added the basic content of the 'getTotalFree' routine to the
new
> HAL-based mechanism. Give it a whirl, and let me know of any
problems.
Fails to compile for me on Solaris 9 SPARC:
cc -I../../includ
Dave Shield wrote:
> I've just added the basic content of the 'getTotalFree' routine to the new
> HAL-based mechanism. Give it a whirl, and let me know of any problems.
Fails to compile for me on Solaris 9 SPARC:
cc -I../../include -I/home/anders/src/net-snmp-5.5svn/include -I.
-I../../agent -I
On 06/01/07, Thomas Anders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there a good reason why the getTotalFree() routine from the old
> implementation has been dropped in the new? I can't believe there's no good
> way
> to get NETSNMP_MEM_TYPE_VIRTMEM values on Solaris.
I've just added the basic content of
Dave,
in the light of bug #1628613 (no memTotalFree.0 with 5.4 on Solaris), I've been
looking into both
./agent/mibgroup/ucd-snmp/memory_solaris2.c and
./agent/mibgroup/hardware/memory/memory_solaris2.c .
Is there a good reason why the getTotalFree() routine from the old
implementation has been
