2009/3/4 Zé Flash :
> I have still some issues regarding architecture, after discussing with
> some colleagues...What is the difference between using "context based
> addressing" and using a "proxy forwarder" to connect multiple devices
> (sensors), using a switch, while sharing the same stan
Hi all!
Thanks for your contributions!
I have still some issues regarding architecture, after discussing with
some colleagues...What is the difference between using "context based
addressing" and using a "proxy forwarder" to connect multiple devices
(sensors), using a switch, while sha
2009/1/22 Zé Flash :
> Ok... from what you explained, when I register a new instance of a MIB I
> have to specify the context in which I want it to be accessible. But, how
> can I announce this "new" context to the management system? How can I say
> that there is a new sensor?
That's up to the per
Ok... from what you explained, when I register a new instance of a MIB I
have to specify the context in which I want it to be accessible. But, how
can I announce this "new" context to the management system? How can I say
that there is a new sensor?
Thanks for the prompt answer! ;)
On Thu, Jan 22,
2009/1/22 Zé Flash :
> Is it possible to have multiple instances of the same MIB registered in an
> agent?
Yes.
But obviously, there needs to be some way for the manager to specify
*which* version of the MIB they are querying.
One approach would be for the various devices to register individual
Hello Community!!
I'm rather new to SNMP coding and I have a doubt regarding MIBs... Is it
possible to have multiple instances of the same MIB registered in an agent?
For example... I have one master system with one SNMP agent (central
communications station). What I want to do is to connect multi
