Wes Hardaker wrote:
> I don't believe so. It does do size checking of the data that it is
> writing, so a overflow is not possible. It would produce an error and
> the packet couldn't be sent, but it shouldn't produce a buffer overflow.
> Please let us know (immediately) if you find a specific ca
> "AL" == Aleksandr Lomanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
AL> The forward asn encoding is not finished.
It's finished as far as it is going to go feature-wise. The code is
very old and much of it derived from a previous library that came from
the cmu-snmp package.
AL> It doesn't support memor
Hello, all!
Wes Hardaker wrote:
> I'm not sure how I think about removing the forward encoding... I'll
> have to think about it. One ramification is that if we remove the
> generic BER routines, there could be applications that still make use of
> the forwarding encoding ones (why they're using
