Re: abstraction layers and directory hierarchy

2005-09-13 Thread Dave Shield
On Mon, 2005-09-12 at 15:48 -0700, Wes Hardaker wrote: > Dave> And when I finally get TBB off my back, it'll be relevant to my > Dave> planned re-working of many of these ucd-snmp MIBs as well. > > The second B means "Beautiful" or "Bountyfull" right? No - the second B means "Book". I think you p

Re: abstraction layers and directory hierarchy

2005-09-12 Thread Wes Hardaker
> On Tue, 06 Sep 2005 15:51:45 +0100, Dave Shield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: Dave> And when I finally get TBB off my back, it'll be relevant to my Dave> planned re-working of many of these ucd-snmp MIBs as well. The second B means "Beautiful" or "Bountyfull" right? -- Wes Hardaker Sparta, In

Re: abstraction layers and directory hierarchy

2005-09-06 Thread Dave Shield
On Tue, 2005-09-06 at 10:29 -0400, Robert Story wrote: > DS> The other thing that might help is a move towards greater use of > DS> the Hardware Abstraction Layer that I started to put in place a > DS> couple of months ago. It currently only covers CPU and memory > DS> (and only for Linux boxes),

abstraction layers and directory hierarchy

2005-09-06 Thread Robert Story
DS> The other thing that might help is a move towards greater use of DS> the Hardware Abstraction Layer that I started to put in place a DS> couple of months ago. It currently only covers CPU and memory DS> (and only for Linux boxes), but it's a step in the right direction. I noticed this when i