Re: com2SecList

2009-01-27 Thread Dave Shield
2009/1/12 Dana Burns : > com2SecList suffers from being transport-domain specific. > I believe it should be moved to snmplib/snmp_transport.c and > made tdomain-neutral. I agree. Most other transport-related configuration uses a standard prefix-based syntax for specifying transport

Re: com2SecList

2009-01-12 Thread Dana Burns
com2SecList suffers from being transport-domain specific. I believe it should be moved to snmplib/snmp_transport.c and made tdomain-neutral. Actually, the 3 existing flavors of com2SecEntry should be replaced with an snmpCommunityEntry defined by the coexistence mib (rfc 3584). Dana dan anderson

com2SecList

2009-01-09 Thread dan anderson
Why is there no exposed API for adding to com2SecList in snmpUDPDomain.[c|h]? Right now the only way to add a community->securityname mapping programatically is to call the token parser; is this because of a plan to deprecate com2SecList? Also, why are vacm_conf.c:vacm_in_view()