Does this affect us?
http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/08/17/0030243&tid=93&tid=162&tid=1&tid
=218
BS> When will 0.9.7 be ready for prime time?
TA>It is. Like I said: get latest 0.9.7-stable snapshot. It's the best
OpenSSL there is. BTW, this is the OpenSSL core developer's
recommendation, n
Bruce Shaw wrote:
So what needs to be installed on the computers receiving the binaries?
> Do I have to cobble up an openssl install as well?
"ldd" is your friend. The net-snmp binaries are linked against
libcrypto.so.0.9.7, so you need just that. Or compile static.
> When will 0.9.7 be ready for
> What openssl should I be using?
In general, latest 0.9.7-stable snapshot is preferred over released 0.9.7d
which has nasty bugs. Those known bugs fortunately don't affect Net-SNMP,
though.
So what needs to be installed on the computers receiving the binaries? Do I
have to cobble up an openssl
Bruce Shaw wrote:
Encryption suport: DES AES128 AES192 AES256
[...]
To get the extras, do I simply upgrade openssl or do I need a newer gcc?
The former: upgrade OpenSSL.
Will upgrading openssl break other applications relying open ssl?
That depends on the applications and how you compiled and insta
I'm compiling net-snmp-5.1.2 across a variety of Solaris platforms and
getting different results.
I'm assuming it's because of differences between gcc and openssl versions.
FOr example, on a sun4m Solaris 8 box using gcc 3.3 and openssl 0.9.7d I
get:
Authentication support: MD5 SHA1
Encryption
