Just an FYI, I wrote an article for IBM Developerworks on IPython and
Net-SNMP.
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/aix/library/au-netsnmpnipython/
-
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It
One other coding design question:
I think Session is a pretty cool idea, but what about making it a
Super Class and having a Version 2 and Version 3 Class inhert from
Session? If these two classes overloaded the default methods and had
default keyword arguments it would be easier to subclass in O
Noah Gift wrote:
> On 5/21/07, Wes Hardaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > "NG" == Noah Gift <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The ideal not technical implementation
> would be an egg could install itself automatically against a source
> tree. Even better would be if the egg could work independen
They are pretty nice. it is like apt-get for python modules in one
sense. We might try to get some help from the eggs mailing list. I
could do a little research and find out some more and get back to you.
On 5/22/07, Wes Hardaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > "NG" == Noah Gift <[EMAIL PROT
> "NG" == Noah Gift <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
NG> I am not sure of the actual implementation details myself, I could
NG> research it if you need help. The ideal not technical implementation
NG> would be an egg could install itself automatically against a source
NG> tree. Even better would
On 5/21/07, Wes Hardaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > "NG" == Noah Gift <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> NG> On this subject, do you think it would be possible to decouple the
> NG> net-SNMP core and the python bindings at all? The reason I ask is
> NG> that the preferred python module instal
> "NG" == Noah Gift <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
NG> On this subject, do you think it would be possible to decouple the
NG> net-SNMP core and the python bindings at all? The reason I ask is
NG> that the preferred python module installation method is to use
NG> something called "easy_install" w
On 5/17/07, Wes Hardaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > "GSM" == G S Marzot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> GSM> hmmm...if you had done a full install of the net-snmp package I
> GSM> think ldconfig should have been run for you.
>
> For the record, if you do a make install from the net-snmp dir
> "GSM" == G S Marzot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
GSM> hmmm...if you had done a full install of the net-snmp package I
GSM> think ldconfig should have been run for you.
For the record, if you do a make install from the net-snmp directory,
the build system does *NOT* run ldconfig. It prints a
G. S. Marzot wrote:
> looks good in a quick eyeball review...thanks Thomas.
Applied to 5.4.x and trunk (r16352).
+Thomas
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 expre
looks good in a quick eyeball review...thanks Thomas.
-G
Thomas Anders wrote:
> Noah Gift wrote:
>> It would be super, super, super cool if we could install the python
>> bindings
>> via "easy_install" from the python cheeseshop without even worrying about
>> the underlying net-snmp package. You
On 09/05/07, Thomas Anders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've just submitted the following patch (from
> Debian) which would at least make life easier for packagers:
> Would anyone be willing to review it?
I'm no Python expert (to put it mildly!), but this patch seems:
a) pla
Noah Gift wrote:
> It would be super, super, super cool if we could install the python
> bindings
> via "easy_install" from the python cheeseshop without even worrying about
> the underlying net-snmp package. You would get a ton of python people
> using
> net-SNMP if eggs were available. At PyCon
> running the test suite might have shown a prob before install...
That is a good point, I don't remember running the test. I need to
compile it again on a few more VM's so I will report back with Cent OS and
Ubuntu notes.
On a fresh Ubuntu 7.04 install and using a tarball from svn last ni
On 5/9/07, G. S. Marzot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Noah Gift wrote:
> Not really, as I was able to compile with lots of warnings, but when I
went
> to install the egg the snmp module was linked a non-existance shared
object
> (not in path). So this was a python problem, although, I didn't reall
Noah Gift wrote:
> Not really, as I was able to compile with lots of warnings, but when I went
> to install the egg the snmp module was linked a non-existance shared object
> (not in path). So this was a python problem, although, I didn't really
> test
> the regular snmp stuff to much..I would thi
Not really, as I was able to compile with lots of warnings, but when I went
to install the egg the snmp module was linked a non-existance shared object
(not in path). So this was a python problem, although, I didn't really test
the regular snmp stuff to much..I would think someone would have poin
just for the record...thous was a general net-snmp install related problem
rather than anything related to the python bindings...right?
thanks, G
Noah Gift wrote:
> Well the good news is that, with the help of a colleague, I was able
> to get the bindings to work properly. When I compiled from s
Thanks. I started a page and put a usage example. Someone else is
editing right now, but I will probably add more later.
On 5/9/07, Dave Shield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 09/05/07, Noah Gift <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If we have a wiki for the python bindings,
> > I can put what I lea
On 09/05/07, Noah Gift <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If we have a wiki for the python bindings,
> I can put what I learned up so far.
Your wish is my command, Oh Master.
See
http://www.net-snmp.org/wiki/index.php?title=Python_Bindings
> As for the separate mailing list, it might encourage mo
Well the good news is that, with the help of a colleague, I was able
to get the bindings to work properly. When I compiled from source on
ubuntu 7.04 and then installed the python egg it could not find
libnetsnmp.so.15 when I did an import from ipython.
My colleague used ldconfig to link the path
On 08/05/07, Noah Gift <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I had problems importing the netsnmp python moduel once I had compiled
> version 5.4. Is the version in the trunk a better place to checkout
> the python bindings?
I don't think there's any significant difference between the two
Comparing the tw
Sorry for the double post, but this is the traceback I get on the
version in the trunk as well:
In [1]: import netsnmp
---
Traceback (most recent call last)
/src/net-snmp-svn-main/python/ in ()
/src/net-snmp-svn-m
I had problems importing the netsnmp python moduel once I had compiled
version 5.4. Is the version in the trunk a better place to checkout
the python bindings?
Noah
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB
24 matches
Mail list logo
