Den 01-12-2010 16:23, Wes Hardaker skrev:
> NB> Maybe it was just your magic typedefs that were more wacky than
> NB> magic?
>
> It was a patch from patch DB. (not my bad)
:-)
Looking further at it, I can see that much of this was older ...
The following patch, which I will commit in a moment
> I had a bet with myself that some older system somewhere would choke.
> I won. Sigh.
NB> Older systems? CentOS 5.5 is still very much alive
True. my bad.
NB> Maybe it was just your magic typedefs that were more wacky than
NB> magic?
It was a patch from patch DB. (not my bad)
--
Wes H
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 02:16:28PM -0800, Wes Hardaker wrote:
> I had a bet with myself that some older system somewhere would choke.
> I won. Sigh.
Older systems? CentOS 5.5 is still very much alive, both Ubuntu 10.10
and Redhat 6.0 uses __u32 etc. in their ethtool.h?
Maybe it was just your m
> On Tue, 30 Nov 2010 22:40:27 +0100, Niels Baggesen
> said:
NB> This woodoo in interface_linux.c does not work for CentOS 5.5
I had a bet with myself that some older system somewhere would choke.
I won. Sigh.
I'll revert it.
--
Wes Hardaker
Cobham Analytic Solutions
-
