Re: instance handlers

2004-11-18 Thread Coders
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 22:41:50 +0100 Magnus wrote: MF> On Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 03:39:09PM -0500, Robert Story wrote: MF> > On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 20:46:01 +0100 Magnus wrote: MF> > MF> It seems as if netsnmp_register_instance doesn't set the MF> > MF> FULLY_QUALIFIED_INSTANCE flag on the registration an

Re: instance handlers

2004-11-17 Thread Magnus Fromreide
On Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 03:39:09PM -0500, Robert Story wrote: > On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 20:46:01 +0100 Magnus wrote: > MF> It seems as if netsnmp_register_instance doesn't set the > MF> FULLY_QUALIFIED_INSTANCE flag on the registration and further it looks > MF> as if the handler interface doesn't supp

Re: instance handlers

2004-11-17 Thread Coders
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 20:46:01 +0100 Magnus wrote: MF> It seems as if netsnmp_register_instance doesn't set the MF> FULLY_QUALIFIED_INSTANCE flag on the registration and further it looks MF> as if the handler interface doesn't support sending flags with the MF> object registration at all as it uses a

instance handlers

2004-11-17 Thread Magnus Fromreide
Hello. It seems as if netsnmp_register_instance doesn't set the FULLY_QUALIFIED_INSTANCE flag on the registration and further it looks as if the handler interface doesn't support sending flags with the object registration at all as it uses a constant 0 for the flags parameter in netsnmp_register_h