Re: memory problem after sending trap

2008-01-03 Thread Robert Story
On Tue, 25 Dec 2007 18:19:22 +0100 slah wrote: SK> while using send_v2trap() api in net-snmp 5.3.0.1- memory size increased by SK> 40K for each SK> trap sent till it reaches 21 MB and no increase after that. SK> snmp_free_varbind is called in our code after send_v2trap(). This is the retention of

Re: memory problem after sending trap

2007-12-27 Thread Wes Hardaker
> "sk" == slah klifi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: sk> while using send_v2trap() api in net-snmp 5.3.0.1- memory size increased by sk> 40K for each sk> trap sent till it reaches 21 MB and no increase after that. sk> snmp_free_varbind is called in our code after send_v2trap(). Can you try using

memory problem after sending trap

2007-12-25 Thread slah klifi
while using send_v2trap() api in net-snmp 5.3.0.1- memory size increased by 40K for each trap sent till it reaches 21 MB and no increase after that. snmp_free_varbind is called in our code after send_v2trap(). when we comment send_v2trap() the memory don't increase i think that the pdu isn't free