Den 04-03-2015 kl. 10:17 skrev Gleb Smirnoff:
I see, you use { CTL_NET, PF_ROUTE, 0, 0, NET_RT_IFLIST, 0 };
I'd suggest to use getifaddrs(3), it uses more modern sysctl
NET_RT_IFLISTL, note the L at end. And the library function
takes the burden of parsing the stuff.
That looks interesting.
Niels,
On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 09:06:11PM +0100, Niels Baggesen wrote:
N Den 04-03-2015 kl. 10:17 skrev Gleb Smirnoff:
N I see, you use { CTL_NET, PF_ROUTE, 0, 0, NET_RT_IFLIST, 0 };
N
N I'd suggest to use getifaddrs(3), it uses more modern sysctl
N NET_RT_IFLISTL, note the L at end. And
On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 09:33:30PM +0100, Niels Baggesen wrote:
N Den 27-02-2015 kl. 22:22 skrev Gleb Smirnoff:
N Now time for net-snmp, which isn't piece of cake. And I'd like
N to get it done properly, and not to store a patch in FreeBSD port
N for ages, but to integrate the patch right in
Hi!
[I'm not subscribed to the list, so please keep me in Cc]
I'm the guy, who often breaks compilation of net-snmp on FreeBSD,
changing layout of kernel structures. And I'm about to change them
even more this year. However, I'd like to keep net-snmp working.
But it looks like, I won't be
On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 09:33:30PM +0100, Niels Baggesen wrote:
N Den 27-02-2015 kl. 22:22 skrev Gleb Smirnoff:
N Now time for net-snmp, which isn't piece of cake. And I'd like
N to get it done properly, and not to store a patch in FreeBSD port
N for ages, but to integrate the patch right in
Den 27-02-2015 kl. 22:22 skrev Gleb Smirnoff:
Now time for net-snmp, which isn't piece of cake. And I'd like
to get it done properly, and not to store a patch in FreeBSD port
for ages, but to integrate the patch right in the main net-snmp repo.
So, I'm asking for your help here. Waiting for a
Hi!
I'm the guy, who often breaks compilation of net-snmp on FreeBSD,
changing layout of kernel structures. And I'm about to change them
even more this year. However, I'd like to keep net-snmp working.
But it looks like, I won't be able to do that without your help,
since patches are about to
